29 Aug
2013
29 Aug
'13
8:39 a.m.
On 8/26/13, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
Datagrams don't give you any useful anonymity, ... usability for example to support UDP traffic and applications which
Are we necessarily even speaking strictly of UDP 'datagrams' or applications? For example, I presume there might be something to be said for software switched packet/cell network stacks. Even if they are encapsulated in meshes of TCP overlay circuits for the TCP properties. Streams of buckets passing inside, be they full of ham or discarded chaff. The cost is the bandwidth you wish to dedicate to it, the cpu/ram to pass, route and control it. Can old ATM transports be anonymized or assist in that...