The Cari Machet Show [Was: Privacy advocates resign over facial recognition plans]

You've never had to give someone some quiet time in a channel before? It was a silence ban, not a total ban. Not only did you not catch the joke, you didn't take the hint. So, here you go. Your very own thread in Cari Machet land, where all "white" people are lazy (whatever "white" is), fascist and racist (I hope you're including yourself.) -S ---------- On August 14, 2015 5:47:11 PM Cari Machet wrote:

getting us back on track subject wise ... now that is a joke

i dont think being a fascist has anything to do with cypherpunks

the desire to ban someone is not the structure of this space FOR REASONS it is open for structural reasons - philosophical reasons... ya know LOGIC

if the desire to ban people is inside you then you are engaging fascism

when some people will die for others freedom its totally repulsive that you would even desire to ban someone from cypherpunks list

somewhere inside you shelley you know this ... please engage in self critique - if i am so monstrous why read the words i write ? just disengage - take responsibility and disengage On Aug 14, 2015 9:38 AM, "Shelley" wrote:

...

On August 13, 2015 10:24:50 PM Peter Gutmann wrote:

Shelley writes:

...

...

mode #cypherpunks +b ~q: carimachet@gmail.com

For procmail users, I've found that:

:0 * ^From: *carimachet /dev/null

:0 B * Cari Machet /dev/null

gets rid of most of it.

Peter.

Yes, or I could add it to my sieve script. Honestly, I was just trying to get us back on track in a silly way. Someone asked that we get back to cypherpunk topics; I thought it was a mild & funny hint for her to do so.

-S