On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:01:59 -0800 Rayzer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
rysiek wrote a luv note to Juan:
(regarding the definition of "civil society")
Wait, does your definition of "civil society" *require* an organisation to be a "libertarian voluntarist" one? And what would that mean?
If required it would mean you're 'outside' (and we're back to a hinting of fascism...)
You are a self described collectivist, for fucks sake. And fascism is a variety of collectivism. The 'nation', 'race', 'society', the 'workers' or whatever 'collectives' you fancy, have absolute 'authority' over individuals. And it's not just that as a collectivist you are quite close to the 'fascism' you whine about. You've clearly shown that when people criticize crass state actions like the harrasment on people on roads, YOU SIDE WITH THE FUCKING STATE. Again, you are nothing but the typical social democrat pretending to be an anarcho-who-knows-what. Ah, yes! You are the true kind of anarchist. The DVM-Anarchist! You are as fake as the libertarians who vote for reagan and bush. Granted at least you've argued against american wars in the middle east...