--On Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:01 AM -0500 John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:
http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html
You guys think the story is to be believed? <--- I know it's a stupid/rhetorical question, but I couldn't help it =P
Leah McGrath Goodman
@truth_eater
What a piece of shit reporting. Journalists compulsively play pop psychologist is reporting on targets to obscure their lack of technical capability. When ridiculed for this they say readers want the gossip because they too lack technical comprehension.
Not a single journalist resists the temptation for slimey personal analysis to boost sales from Obama to Putin to Satoshi, from NY Times to Guardian to WaPo to Wired to The Intercept.
Still the tech firms suck up to the ignorant outlets for lurid coverage, crypto firms now leading the pack to promote comsec panic for digital cash-in. You, once honorably corrupt, dear cpunks, should be raking it in as if in compelled to rationalize cryptoligarchy.
Fuck them dead, the whipsawing comsec windfall bandits.
At 09:05 AM 3/6/2014, you wrote:
I *told* you I wasn't Satoshi.
;-)
Poor bastard...
Cheers, RAH