On Sun, 4 Dec 2016 23:31:05 +1100 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
Are you not aware that David Duke abhors violence
Really? So he's an anarchist? OK, OK, no he doesn't abhor violence. Duke is a fucking american nazi, of the sincere variety. What are you trying to do, exactly, Zen? You are of course free to say whatever you want, but it would be nice if you made it clear what you stand for. Whatever it is, it seems as relevant to this list as rayzers mental vomits praising castro and his beloverd jew-kristian nazis.
any decent man would, and that when he discovered that a) other "klans" were violent and b) that he could not control or stop them, that he then left and has since forever publicly decried such violence?
you are willing to apologize and completely disavow your association with known racists and bigots such as David Duke, I might reconsider.
David Duke is only "a known racist" due to the 40 year vilification of him by the American "main stream" media.
You think you are opposing the 'mainstream' by supporting a guy like duke? Don't you realize that he is the 100% part of the amerikan mainstream? The only difference between duke and quinn is that quinn speaks about 'niggers' io private while pretending to be a 'progressive' in public.
Is it possible that the image you have in your mind of David Duke, is antithetical to who he is as a real and compassionate human, and that this image has been constructed only secondarily by you, but primarily by the abhorrent propaganda against him over the last 40 years?
Honestly, you're damn close to being the poster child for the reason we need moderation on this list. (Not censorship, moderation.)
Please, bring a fact to the discussion.
I respect, and wholly support your stance against racism and violence.
When (if) you ever undertake first-hand research (such as reading David Duke's actual words, or watching him actually speak) you might just find yourself wholly surprised.