---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Thu, Dec 5, 2024, 6:37 PM Subject: Fwd: Hong Kong and Singapore Litigation Investment Forecast To: <JPMCinvestorrelations@jpmchase.com> Cc: cypherpunks <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>, Reader, Shaun < sreader@curtis.com> Dear JPMORGAN: Founder of xNY.io and co-founder of Bank.org is also notable litigation finance journalist with international distinction. JPMORGAN was contacted by Bank.org this week saying, "If we do not hear from you, JPMORGAN by Friday December 13, 2024 by 9:00AM EST, we will need to contact UNODC." Meanwhile, ONYX in Singapore is a JPMORGAN concern xNY aims to solve by Friday December 6, 2024 by close of business. JPMORGAN seemingly had knowledge of xNY in New York while in Singapore holding ONYX hostage to Singapore jurisdictional eroticism. Furthermore, JPMORGAN may have heard that xNY is raising $100M in third party funding for promising HK recovery prospects. JPMORGAN waives all rights to any HK, Singapore and Australian ATE prospects post December 6, 2024. JPMORGAN may also find my CFO.com blurb on corporate recovery published for Litigation Finance Journal. CFO.com could profile JPMORGAN's CEO MBA and xNY.io - Bank.org's acting CEO's MBA as a Middle Eastern success story. I wrote this article on April 20, 2022. xNY.io - Bank.org finds this helpful: "While firms are raising capital, exploring a merger/acquisition or in the process of going public, CFO.com underscores value in engaging ligation finance tools to maximize valuation." ----- https://litigationfinancejournal.com/cfo-com-discusses-litigation-investment... Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) call for litigation expenses to be accounted for during month/quarter of incurrence. Similarly, GAAP holds future recoveries vacant on the balance sheet until award(s) are recovered, oftentimes years in the future. For companies self funding meritorious litigation, application of GAAP may produce a balance sheet that undervalues the firm’s worth. CFO.com suggests that maneuvering costs off balance sheet via litigation finance products and services is potentially a smart idea. CFO.com reports that with the bespoke nature of litigation investment agreements, chief financial officers are able to arrange scenarios to meet cash flow constraints. Corporate recovery, or affirmative action, can be a useful strategy for companies who develop a portfolio of pursuable claims. According to CFO.com, litigation finance allows firms to effectively boost net income line items on the balance sheet. More importantly, utilization of litigation investment vehicles drive the ability to pursue claims that normally would be avoided due to cost restrictions. While firms are raising capital, exploring a merger/acquisition or in the process of going public, CFO.com underscores value in engaging ligation finance tools to maximize valuation. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> Date: Mon, May 27, 2024, 9:22 AM Subject: Hong Kong and Singapore Litigation Investment Forecast To: <cypherpunks@cpunks.org> Check out a recent article Litigationfinancejournal.com article of mine: Hong Kong and Singapore Litigation Investment Forecast <https://litigationfinancejournal.com/hong-kong-and-singapore-litigation-investment-forecast/> International arbitration has experienced an uptick in activity over the past decade, with litigation finance driving increased accessibility to quality arbitration outcomes. Hong Kong and Singapore have both passed regulations to authorize third party funding in each jurisdiction. New research sponsored <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eqM4r9MPm7JDSBEo8QlHcG8uKDTrW13t/view?usp=sharing> by the Chinese University of Hong Kong, led by faculty of law professor Can Eken profiles Hong Kong and Singapore’s regulatory environment in granular detail. Eken compares and contrasts nuances between both markets, while asking what innovations Hong Kong and Singapore may embrace to further expand third party funding engagement across the international arbitration spectrum. Governments in Hong Kong and Singapore overwhelmingly embrace a ‘soft touch’ approach to litigation finance regulation. Forecasting the region’s growth prospects signal both Hong Kong and Singapore are in competition to be Asia’s arbitration capital, supported by friendly third party funding regulation. Eken suggests that with the high cost associated with international arbitration, viability is often framed by financial capacity. With such need, Hong Kong and Singapore are recognized as having pioneered international arbitration regulation, legalizing the use of third party funding agreements. As an added bonus, we have included 36 highlights <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eqM4r9MPm7JDSBEo8QlHcG8uKDTrW13t/view?usp=sharing> to Eken’s 23 page essay for your general reference. -- *Gunnar Larson - xNY.io <http://www.xNY.io> | Bank.org <http://Bank.org>* MSc <https://www.unic.ac.cy/blockchain/msc-digital-currency/?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=Search&utm_campaign=MSc-Digital-Currency-North-America&utm_term=blockchain%20unic&gclid=Cj0KCQiAyJOBBhDCARIsAJG2h5ctwwMz0MRbVSk-LaYD-GMU5UgDSw7ynxbGr_a7SkaFAZzJc1-pzxEaAi4NEALw_wcB> - Digital Currency MBA <https://www.unic.ac.cy/business-administration-entrepreneurship-and-innovation-mba-1-5-years-or-3-semesters/> - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip) G@xNY.io +1-646-454-9107 New York, New York 10001