On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:00 PM, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 2:56 AM, jim bell <jamesdbell9@yahoo.com> wrote:
... "The NSA's legal squirming is bad enough. But an agency writing itself a blank check to allegedly destroy evidence based on the sheer size and complexity of the possibly illegal program in questionis another thing entirely. There shouldn't be an "unless your dragnet surveillance program is reallybig" exception to the Fourth Amendment.
A lot of the issue is why *your* records, metadata, and maybe even full take, are on government disks if *you* have not been the subject of a specific warrant against you under the Fourth. That's not supposed to happen (ie: it's illegal, regardless of whatever postprocessing, access, expiry and oversight rules there may be) and that bothers people, a lot....
feature; not bug! configure plausible deniability to zeroise incriminating information. utilize exceptionally compartmented collections to destroy credible opponents. walk away successful without a trace to be seen... these fucks are playing a dirty game... how best to curtail?