On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:56:27 -0400 grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/19/19, Punk <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
is that the thing that requires a 'trusted'(LMAO!!) 'setup'?
No,
some more FACTS on zcash https://www.zcashcommunity.com/2017/07/31/zcash-separating-fact-fiction/ quote:"There is no evidence whatsoever that the first Trusted setup was compromised." sure sure. Absence of evidence is evidence of abscence!! Right? Right? quote:"at the time of writing this 23% of all network transactions are shielded. " in other words 77% of transactions ARE PUBLIC. quote:"Zcash founders decided to allocate 10% of the 21 million Zcash that will ever be issued to go to a set of addresses dubbed the “Founders Reward”" sp 10% of all monetary base has been TAXED. quote:"For an average transaction size of 2000 bytes in a Private " that is to say, private transactions are 10 times bigger than bitcoin transactions. So what would happen if zcash was actually USED and quote: "Fiction: Zcash is not widely accepted on Darknet markets and somehow that’s a bad thing Opinion: This last one always leaves me saying WTF? Why would you want to promote the use of your favorite crypto-currency on dark marketplaces? The only reasons I can think of are self-centeredness, greed, and short-sightedness (or a combination of all those). " oh look! the piece of shit who wrote that article is making it quite clear that he's against freedom. quote:"Zcash doesn’t need darknet markets to be successful and I hope that Zcash doesn’t ever get widely used on them." priceless quote:"Illegal use is often an unfortunate by-product of any advance in technology." so what were you saying grarpamp?