On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 05:08:10PM -0700, Razer wrote:
On 09/13/2017 12:07 PM, Marina Brown quoted Jim Bell:
Sorry, but you are not even hundreds of miles away from being correct on this. To label DNS service, which is essentially monopoly, as supporting "genocide" is about 3-4 leaps of logic, far too much to work. A few nuts spouting nonsense is far, very far, from "conspiracy to commit genocide". Merely providing necessary net services to them, just as is done for thousands of sites, cannot possibly be described that way.
Cmon Jim! You know better! That wing ding at the beginning of the Persian Gulf Invasion? An Annapolis Ham Packet bbs that handled an anti-war message? Remember?
The first node IS responsible for content, barring federal intervention/regulation such as declaring a mode of operation or organization, a "Common Carrier". DNSes have NO SUCH IMMUNITY.
"Precedent" may possibly be on your side IDK. But dude, how's it like shilling for Godaddy and extra-judicial "justice"? Of course I don't expect much else from you these days...