Karl wrote:
On 10/12/20, Stefan Claas <sac@300baud.de> wrote:
Stefan Claas wrote:
| Stefan, I got: | AgAAAHYwSAAAAO+xQIT5meBNroABRxnwz1nF8Apub/z5OiqCftZUpGTBbcejwe6XQF4lpAnhW9YG | NAl9/zdLkj8FOG2NQmhbx82HXJv1Ju2c1w== | from you. Is this the same encrypted message as the one you sent? I'm expecting that it is.
AgAAAHYwjgEAACeQYcUutIj71LXOwf6SZU3wiTMAhlKBNAw552GqDynQ4nKtGX2l+5beCjexTFSW +MTj6dbJhjfTVpRzalwY19NSWrjeFZpy3WLi78oz3Yh/Tt7tLI630KJUO5vlAOqLM8IJmV4//ZeG 2AQgpofe61FXDm8H/SXRNFGD9K3Y/sIwtFbzGgyNJxEMIILTtkGCuWvr3Ub6nS06m4PuwP4Eeu0a ObmohUDGnXNuKEiULvyBbP2X05+s5ogXrzN5lh3pAW3q345kWDteqvqdS3o6baVTYthEb63m5dRg vIPIeto8v0ZBqJ9zZqIGPKlthQ9u0TXHR4xrdUUWKVxZfyOP906PPSmmoc10zQtWR3Bw9rZ3ym9Y HxXSu8YvnvGqH+IHzn4qYZYh+WywfcNwoygyNVKuswXDSbz1okDq0yMixIoi6at5ZHCJZDmu9KJx +LwUQWw7FYR9u2TqFsb+/w8snk9SI8gBTQW4jDoDDbGYYySDQqJA4SOhATwEMRuBySZEQbJ+qtlv zpPl4upnvipG
AgAAAHYwBwIAALj3MZ/ShsJxjdYIfsw22RKVJePXqE4q6+lwN9/WJA+H16C1chNRDPVgNtau4BDj DAfkY7LBXvhyVlORTzJtdglh5FV5Vu+YlcqHGsLzJRxLKJlLVYS1jbU9+4yea2ftG3Yo/fJQXdCH AfLL4ip86KR0fgOj2ih9lXJjQ6tFWIEbWoX6lzEhccCgPgPRciDlv19VGCX66aP2nFIPr0qDVw2c sMMgRCMlsnQKWIWspYX62a7dq7T7hm2uCRo+Ak35vj2KMoOkD4aUutr1XDNJ8wm9XuYN9Dh94sgP /kF6gNPo+kwnul80mPFJWHe/o4Ltpe0ONh5MIG53DOLilKMe7CFn1jKzDEujapxmDhD1Pt4WP59q DlJDk3BMGEplyCQSQYCfK3Ot3NZHcmaIcPhhEzPiBBPw2959T5mYUHstumsjoDx9t+xEmCR0gDdT S2dbMhlTCEsu1g3arsc0p63nmxS/q79y7GwAn024lbYMz/OvSM10L2mjGiIkuYsnn8eKw9kJy0YL M70pysgcBbj9l5/oFjPk/L4bz0omP2DsP0sWfN9Vr5+9/uYbfJ0dG6UBnSXwXxFxq/cBhzwPJdWw Uov/5awa2KOwcRToPX2dMWfRAIIngX9L3mHIW579mxA+ItYy+bHjwhQzccUv2PKyPGGSLwzEjzm3 BjvksacLYb/51Cy2dbtqHQ==
BTW. NaClbox messages are authenticated, so no one can send you a message in my name, if they are not in possession of my private key. This avoids then also to use signatures, like with GnuPG.
And the IMHO cool thing about NaClbox is that it is much easier to use and learn than GnuPG.
Why do you not use naclbox to communicate all the time? Couldn't it even be used for the cypherpunks mailing list, if the mailing list had a shared receiving private key, to verify that each person is saying what they intend?
Well, I often receive message in PGP format, because I still have a key pair for GnuPG. Otherwise I already use NaClbox with friends in Germany, the United States and Canada. :-) Regarding the ML, I think the list-owner would not be amused and probably many subscribers would not like the idea either. For that people could use the Usenet group alt.anonymous.messages with a shared hashed subject (hsub) in order to fetch messages, from a.a.m.. Regards Stefan -- NaClbox: cc5c5f846c661343745772156a7751a5eb34d3e83d84b7d6884e507e105fd675 The computer helps us to solve problems, we did not have without him.