On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 03:59:33PM +0200, Lodewijk andré de la porte wrote:
On Sep 30, 2014 3:40 PM, "Georgi Guninski" <guninski@guninski.com> wrote:
If I had a budget for buying sploits, I would pay much more for shockshell than for HB, might be wrong.
This is a really good metric. It instantly combines utility with potential etc.
What the world needs is a 'proof-of-exploit' based cryptocurrency that has a bidding period, and then a 'exclusive' period where the winning bidder gets the sploit, and then a disclosure period where the crypto key to decrypt the sploit becomes public. Then we could tell how serious software vendors are by how many sploits for their own stuff they are the highest bidders for. You might even have Lloyds offering sploit insurance..... The only sound electronic money would then be the one that creates money by sploiting other socially-engineerinable electronic money.