Read the previous post. You don't 'own' anything. You correct factual mistakes but you have no 'side' in the discussion.
You're right. I don't take "sides" for the sake of taking sides. I try to see the value of as many perspectives as possible, and to understand and be able to reason from them. I said, from the outset, that I'm not ideological in that way. Ideology is rather like mental training wheels. There comes a time when you don't need it.
Corrections just mean you need to go look it up and fix it. Not change your mind.
I'm not sure what this even means. If I make a factual mistake, and look it up and see that I was wrong, I then change my mind regarding that fact. It may, or may not, change my interpretation of related facts, but I do change my mind. I presume any sane person thinks this way?
How much does Langley pay you by the word to do that?
We don't get paid by the word. If we did, I'd have already retired. And I don't work for Langley. Brussels.