Do you ever have anything positive or nice to say, Juan?<span></span><br><br>On Saturday, December 14, 2013, Juan Garofalo  wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
--On Friday, December 13, 2013 7:31 PM -0800 Tom Ritter &lt;<a href="javascript:;" onclick="_e(event, &#39;cvml&#39;, &#39;tom@ritter.vg&#39;)">tom@ritter.vg</a>&gt;<br>
wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; I doubt it - abuse through Tor is a legitimate problem.<br>
<br>
<br>
        Not sure what that means. At any rate, there seems to be something wrong<br>
with the bitcoin forum blocking anonymous(sort-of) access, no?<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
&gt; Wikipedia blocks<br>
&gt; editing from Tor for the same reason.<br>
<br>
<br>
        ah, wikipedia....<br>
<br>
<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; There are ideas for solving this though, and it would be cool to see more<br>
&gt; ideas, and more fleshing out of them.  Mike Hearn has talked about having<br>
&gt; people make a bitcoin deposit for an account, and after so much time of<br>
&gt; legitimate use, the deposit is refunded.<br>
<br>
<br>
        Legitimate use? Such as? Parroting whatever garbge the &#39;wikipedia editors&#39;<br>
say it must be parroted?<br>
<br>
<br>
&gt; Before that, if it&#39;s used for<br>
&gt; abuse, the deposit is kept by the service.<br>
<br>
        That&#39;s cool. So, say something those idiots don&#39;t like, and they &#39;keep&#39;<br>
(steal) your money.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; -tom<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>