On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 08:41:24PM -0300, Punk-Stasi 2.0 wrote:
On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 09:56:24 +1100 Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
You may be right, that blackmail plays no significant part in modern politics.
I don't believe it's correct that "blackmail plays no significant part in Western politics today".
'modern politics' is 'western politics'. Last time I checked western scumbags were busy conquering and destroying the world.
Now, the main mechanism in politics is extortion. Subjects are free to obey govcorp or die. That is Western Freedom.
If a guy like epstein, a wall-street jew-thief also ran a blackmail boutique to honestly earn some extra pocket money from donations from his friends, that wouldn't change the nature and modus operandi of govcorp AT ALL.
That's a bold assertion. Is it possible that some politicians might actually vote -against- auditing or ditching the Fed, to protect their reputations (from media exposure that they dallianced with under age "children", or actual children)??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavender_scare
The "Lavender Scare" was a moral panic about homosexual people in the United States government and their mass dismissal from government service.
yes, and? What has that got to do with the fact that any government agent is a criminal, whether he is gay or straight.
See above. His sexual proclivity is not the issue - his propensity to protect his (or her) reputation, in the face of blackmail about his sexual proclivity, is the question.