So the looney "liberal" lefties (commies) want everyone to -have- everything, including "free": - education - medical care - insurance - food - housing - legal aid - etc Labour's Richard Burgon Slams UK Government Cuts to Legal Aid as 'Depriving Human Rights' https://sputniknews.com/uk/202001141078037104-labours-richard-burgon-slams-u... Sadly this communist neo-Marxism is now being sold under the deceptive lie of such gibs being "human rights". Now listen up snowflakes (and all who missed the memo), human rights are sanctions, not gibs. And more particularly, a human right is a sanction which does not infringe the human rights of other humans. Resist being deceived. What is a sanction? A sanction is that action (arising from a power or ability) which you can exercise independent of the authority, will or power of any other human. So a human right is one of those things arising from your own latent (or natural) capacity and ability. For example: - the right to move, walk, travel - the right to communicate - the right to survive - to do those things necessary for the continuance of my physical body - grow food and plants for medicine, farm animals, collect and use water - the right to breathe - the right to think and believe what one wills - the right to build a dwelling to protect you and your family from the elements of nature The reason gibs are not human rights, is that they are not sanctions - instead, gibs is the imposition of your will (effectively, usually by force of the state to "collect" tax) upon another human being. Which is fundamentally evil. Imposing your will on others, is to deny the other the right to choose to do as he pleases in his own life, with his own body and his own time. The despotic "right" to free shit - free gibs - is a consent to despotism. Once we agree to one despotism, we have effectively agreed to all despotisms. "Free" gibs, imposed by the force of the state upon productive individuals, is: - the surrender of individual responsibility (for one's own actions and choices in life) - the consent to all despotisms of the state - the consent to the financial enslavement of your people, your community, your councils and governments If "free shit" is to be couched as a "human right", then at best it is nothing other than a predatorial right of the ignorant and of the predatorial, upon the productive and the responsible. The primary challenge to the fable of the grasshopper and the ant, is "charity". Imposed charity, tends strongly to despotism and descent into madness. https://www.yandex.com/search/?text=grasshopper%20and%20the%20ant&lr=21265 The Ant and the Grasshopper https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ant_and_the_Grasshopper The Ant and the Grasshopper, alternatively titled The Grasshopper and the Ant (or Ants), is one of Aesop's Fables, numbered 373 in the Perry Index.[1] The fable describes how a hungry grasshopper begs for food from an ant when winter comes and is refused. The situation sums up moral lessons about the virtues of hard work and planning for the future.[2] Even in Classical times, however, the advice was mistrusted and an alternative story represented the ant's industry as mean and self-serving. Jean de la Fontaine's delicately ironical retelling in French later widened the debate to cover the themes of compassion and charity. Since the 18th century the grasshopper has been seen as the type of the artist and the question of the place of culture in society has also been included. Argument over the fable's ambivalent meaning has generally been conducted through adaptation or reinterpretation of the fable in literature, arts, and music. ...