Dnia niedziela, 4 października 2015 11:32:32 Razer pisze:
On 10/04/2015 10:22 AM, rysiek wrote:
Dnia niedziela, 4 października 2015 09:38:24 Razer pisze:
On 10/04/2015 08:54 AM, rysiek wrote:
Whether that thing is "money" as we think of it today, sea shells, BitCoin or anything else, is utterly irrelevant here.
But the value of the middleman in the transaction sure isn't.
Anarchist Economics 101 >> http://imgur.com/pQm0ZGs
When A buys X from B for amount Y, it means that both of them value what they are giving away (A: X; B: Y) less than what they are receiving, otherwise they wouldn't do it. In any volountary exchange, including when money is involved, both A and B benefit.
See? It's simple!
The middleman exists to see to it that the exchange is NOT entirely voluntary, and I'm back to that bloody fantasy about Marketers and sales engineers...
Are you saying that if the exchange happens *without* money, it necessarily happens *without* middlemen? Are you saying that if the exchange happens *with* money, it necessarily happens *with* middlemen? Are you saying that if the exchange happens *with* money, it necessarily *is not* entirely voluntary? Are you saying that if the exchange happens *without* money, it necessarily *is* entirely voluntary? -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147