On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 03:51:11PM -0300, juan wrote:
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 08:27:46 +1000 "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
On 12/27/2017 6:35 AM, juan wrote:
again, your mental vomits have been addressed multiple times.
You just repeat your lies over and over without explanation or argument.
Repetitious assertion is unconvincing.
<snip> Holy shit, this is still going on. This is one of the reasons I blocked James "Jim" Donald so long ago. The other is that he is complete human garbage. So, warning, this post is completely off-topic, I'm not trying to debate the existence of Christ, to my mind the case is closed, and whosoever wants to believe some silly shit can believe as they will. This post is just about James Donald. He would be a menace if he weren't a total fucking crank; his ideology is still horrifying. So, feel free to stop reading here if you don't care about James Donald, or if you have a weak stomach. As I said before, all you need to know about Jim is is all over his blog, https://blog.jim.com. His latest entry, my apologies to anyone whom this makes ill, is a perfect example. I'm going to paste it below and after that I'm done with James Donald, directly or indirectly. This blog post is so fucking deranged, in such a mean, fucked up, way.. well, it can only speak for itself: All women are like that December 27th, 2017 Women are attracted to arrogant violent men. They are attracted to IQ<80 criminals because criminals are allowed to be violent, while high status males are not, with the result that the status hierarchy as perceived by women winds up upside down from the status hierarchy as perceived by men. AWALT. All women are like that. When people say that not all women are like that, NAWALT, it is like aging fat feminists saying that different men have different types so you can't say one type of beauty overrules the others. Not so: Men want to fuck young, beautiful and fertile women. Women want to fuck arrogant, violent, criminal men. That is all there is to it. We may nuance after accepting that, but only after accepting that. Brad Pitt got horribly burned. Einstein wound up with a KGB girl friend who cared more about Stalin than Einstein. Feynman needed to learn game, put on an asshole persona, did pretty much what I am doing. If not all women were like that, these famous men would have done better. Feynman scored, I scored, but if General Butt Naked had shown up, wearing a necklace of human eyeballs, an AK47, and nothing else, we would have been shit out of luck. All women react to the same stimuli in the same way. It is just a matter of which stimuli they get exposed to. If Feynman cannot score merely being brilliant, famous, and admired, Brad Pitt gets burned despite being rich, famous, and handsome, Einstein winds up having sex with the KGB and serving as a communist loudspeaker, then all women are like that. The lioness knows which lion to fuck, because she sees him killing her kittens. To align the crude, cruel, simplistic, vicious, and brutal female perception of the male status hierarchy with the subtle, complex, multidimensional, and nuanced reality of the male status hierarchy as actually organized by males, we need to legalize and socially support domestic discipline by taxpaying husbands and fathers, also husbands and fathers that are members of the military, the police, rentacops, and mercenaries. (McLintock), and back that discipline with conspicuously public state violence. We also need to make it legal to use violence on men who come sniffing round your women, as the law was under King Solomon. Then hypergamy will be eugenic, rather than dysgenic. Right now, hypergamy is massively dysgenic. Hence the character I play when interacting with fertile age women. Women have a primitive concept of power. And we men are all dancing monkeys. So, the thing we are forced to do is to become powerful as women understand power. Which unfortunately is anti civilizational and counter civilizational. Hence the need to modify civilization so that high status males get to perform more private violence. It is easier to have more private policing, to make male status hierarchies more convincing to women, than it is to make women have sex with the men that they should, and refrain from having sex with the men that they should not. When affluent respectable middle class white males beat misbehaving daughters and wives, and receive any necessary public assistance in so doing from police and authorities, while low lives do not receive similar assistance, then IQ<80 criminals will stop being so strangely attractive to women, and the guy in the corner office will find himself receiving hot letters from women he has never met. But that said, women are quite agreeable to being made to have sex. They prefer it that way. Resistance is a shit test, and they are turned on by being overpowered. So we need to make it the law that the man that they should have sex with, their husband, the father of their children, gets to overpower them. Posted in culture | 3 Comments