I realized re: disreputed bipartisan and public figures:

As far as I know, nobody is organizing protection of targeted people. Spies among the disruption workers are saying it is time to do that, or there will be a global dictatorship soon. Working with these disruption workers, and protecting their denial behavior, is one way to learn who is in danger and how to protect them.

What might be needed is a corporation, government, nonprofit, or organized group with money that is strong enough to defend people who are not already in one, and strong enough to defend the group as a whole when it is targeted, and unpoison the ways in which it has picked up cultural targeting (e.g. review of impact of internal patterns and changing them).

I don't have anyone to share the above information with, so it hasn't been heard yet.

Anarchists are mostly influenced by handmade zines, the large impacts of obvious behaviors of other anarchist groups, and special agents trying to manipulate them. Educators make some kinds of anarchists but I'm skeptical the set has any size to it. Something similar to anarchy is obvious to most people, because of the harm that nobody fixes nor discusses in public view: then people try to act on that, and end up running into the anarchists who have already tried before.

On Thu, Sep 10, 2020, 10:51 AM Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:

Note, it is incredibly counterproductive to blame BLM on a single professor.

On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, 2:58 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
observation that US govcorp is pretending to be 'anti racist'?

I have many reasons to disagree with Punk-Stasi regarding bitcoin, from a place of an experienced software hacker. But I spent a long time thinking about his question about antiracism pretensions.

What's meaningful here, is that a society is made of multiple groups. SO LONG AS YOU CAN SUSTAIN PRODUCTIVE DIALOGUE BETWEEN THE URGENT, THE HARMED, AND THE POWERFUL, YOU HAVE PEACE. It is the experienced rebels who know how to maintain stability: they had to for a very long time, to ever finally be heard.

Corporations in the US showed they can resist enough to support BLM publicly. The US showed it is still enough of a democracy for the citizens to push the corporations to do this when something got very large.

Influencers showed they can resist enough to get corporate buildings burned down widely, briefly. What do secret powerful people need to plan around?

People who can resist will need to work together. I'm not always available much, but the bsv blockchain's archival retention and access, and phrases like "corporate dictator spy mafia" are all I really was doing.