Davis-Brooke:And yet, there is this perspective:Thank you,When US Privilege Law Applies To Docs Made Outside The US
As globalization manifests itself in disputes over foreign-created documents, a California federal court’s recent trademark decision illustrates nuances of both U.S. privilege frameworks and foreign evidentiary protections that attorneys must increasingly bear in mind, say attorneys at Hunton.
Read full article » | Save to favorites »
Today, my personal safety was jeopardized with Meta's potential involvement.
This is unacceptable.
xNY.io, Bank.org and my self (individually, and separately) seek to be indemnified concerning all aspects of the film below by 5:00pm EST today:
Wednesday 8 May 2024 Debating Chamber - Peter Thiel - Cambridge Union Society (Video w/ Protests):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-UzMRXxN5cy1rpUEa9Zn1tC1kSo-sI4a/view?usp=drivesdk.
Gunnar ✌️ Larson--Gunnar LarsonxNY.io - Bank.org917-580-8053On Tue, Dec 17, 2024, 5:54 AM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:Davis-Brooke:Specific to affiliates to xNY.io - Bank.org, we feel compelled to share with Meta our deep connection with Australia, myself a graduate of Bond University on Australia's Gold Coast.What we are afraid of is Meta using its logo to launder monies, out of Australia for example. If this happens to be true, xNY.io - Bank.org would need to take our claim in the United States for syndication in Australia.I am sure you understand xNY.io - Bank.org's approach to these types of headlines, considering how strict our Australian regulators are compared to other countries:Ladbrokes Owner Sued For AML Breaches By Aussie Watchdog
By Eddie Beaver
Ladbrokes operator Entain Group is facing civil penalty proceedings in Australian Federal Court for "serious and systemic non-compliance" with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing, the country's primary financial regulator said Monday.
Wishing you happy Holidays, Davis-Brooke,Gunnar--Gunnar LarsonxNY.io - Bank.org917-580-8053On Thu, Dec 12, 2024, 7:39 AM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:Davis-Brooke:Looking into this more, xNY.io - Bank.org is questioning Meta's affiliates to our claim:Justices Question Affiliates' Liability In $47M TM Judgment
By Ivan Moreno
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned why lower courts ordered affiliates of a real estate company to pay a $47 million trademark infringement judgment against it when they were not defendants, with Justice Clarence Thomas asking counsel for the prevailing party why they did not include the affiliates in the case.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2024, 5:01 AM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:Davis-Brooke:Thank you for your email and contacting xNY.io - Bank.org.If we upload the raw file for the video in Cambride, it could be considered piracy. Let me contact Cambride to see what they think. Meanwhile, you should be able to watch the video at the link provided, given the gravity of the situation.I have CCd the respected Letitia James, Attorney General of New York State 🗽 to keep her abreast of our conversation today.Ms. James:This video that Davis-Brooke is referring to makes certain statements concerning New York City pertaining to your oversight.Have a great weekend!Thank you,Gunnar--Gunnar LarsonxNY.io - Bank.org917-580-8053On Fri, Dec 6, 2024, 11:37 AM Caswell, Davis-Brooke <DbCaswell@ktslaw.com> wrote:Dear Mr. Larson,
My name is Davis-Brooke and I work with Nicki. We are unable to view/download documents onto our system from outside links. Accordingly, will you please upload any documents into the file share folder that Nicki sent you?
Please let me know if you have any issues accessing this folder.
Best,
Davis-Brooke
Davis-Brooke Caswell
DbCaswell@ktslaw.com
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
1100 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 2800 | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
T 404 815 6174 | F 404 541 3230
My Profile | vCard
From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 12:45 PM
To: Chollet, Nicki <NChollet@ktslaw.com>
Cc: Meta_Defensive_Disputes <Meta_Defensive_Disputes@kilpatricktownsend.com>; Reader, Shaun <sreader@curtis.com>; Caswell, Davis-Brooke <DbCaswell@ktslaw.com>; Teilhaber, Kris <KTeilhaber@ktslaw.com>; cypherpunks <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>
Subject: Re: Meta Platforms, Inc. Board of Directors - USPTO, Digital Assets and Moscow Exchange
Ms. Chollet:
Please find here a reference to our relationship with the Moscow Exchange, as requested:
Wednesday 8 May 2024 Debating Chamber - Peter Thiel - Cambridge Union Society (Video w/ Protests):
Gunnar Larson
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024, 1:46 PM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:
Ms. Chollet:
Thank you again for opening the folder.
We have been occupied recently and will fill the folder soon.
Thank you,
Gunnar
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024, 5:01 PM Chollet, Nicki <NChollet@ktslaw.com> wrote:
Gunnar,
I have opened a secure folder for you to put documents in. Please let me know if you have any problems accessing the folder.
Best,
Nicki
Nicki Chollet
NChollet@ktslaw.com
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
1100 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 2800 | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
T 404 815 6010 | M 404 906 6948 | F 404 541 3387
My Profile | vCard
From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io>
Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 5:12 AM
To: Chollet, Nicki <NChollet@ktslaw.com>
Cc: investor@fb.com; Meta_Defensive_Disputes <Meta_Defensive_Disputes@kilpatricktownsend.com>; cypherpunks <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>; Reader, Shaun <sreader@curtis.com>
Subject: Re: Meta Platforms, Inc. Board of Directors - USPTO, Digital Assets and Moscow Exchange
**CAUTION: External Email**
Dear Ms. Chollet:
We have the documents you are looking for concerning the Moscow Exchange.
xNY.io - Bank.org would like to orgaize a secure channel to share this information with Meta.
How would you like to proceed?
Best,
Gunnar
--
Gunnar Larson
xNY.io - Bank.org
917-580-8053
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022, 3:16 PM Chollet, Nicki <NChollet@kilpatricktownsend.com> wrote:
Dear Mr. Larson,
We have reviewed your correspondence and are still unable to determine the merits of your claim. Before we can properly evaluate or respond to your claim, you will need to provide additional details regarding the basis for your claim and documentation of your relationship with Moscow Exchange or ownership in the Moscow Exchange mark (for example, trademark registration certificates evidencing your ownership of the alleged marks in question).
Meta Platforms reserves all rights.
Sincerely,
Nichole Davis Chollet
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Suite 2800 | 1100 Peachtree Street NE | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
office 404 815 6010 | cell 404 906 6948 | fax 404 541 3387
nchollet@kilpatricktownsend.com | My Profile | VCardFrom: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 2:45 PM
To: Chollet, Nicki <NChollet@kilpatricktownsend.com>; investor@fb.com
Cc: Meta_Defensive_Disputes <Meta_Defensive_Disputes@kilpatricktownsend.com>; cypherpunks <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>
Subject: Re: Meta Platforms, Inc. Board of Directors - USPTO, Digital Assets and Moscow Exchange
Ms. Chollet:
Should we fly with the Red Cross to Menlo Park?
Gunnar--
On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 4:07 PM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:
Ms. Chollet:
Unfortunately, you receive this message with Meta's board of directors under delinquency.
Meanwhile, xNY.io would like to learn Meta's approach to USPTO filing internationally in Jamaica.
Ms. Chollet, Jamaica makes the story even so much more interesting and important.
Thank you,
Gunnar
On Sun, Apr 3, 2022 at 8:33 PM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:
Dear Ms. Chollet:
Thank you again for your reply on Friday specific to Meta's USPTO mark application definition exactness to Moscow Exchange. Ms. Chollet, for reasons you may be aware of, xNY.io must kindly implore Meta's board of directors to recall all eight USPTO applications by 5:00pm Tuesday April 4, 2022 EST.
Being very clear, to make sure there is no confusion to xNY.io's honest aim to protect digital asset innovation, Meta must understand that its USPTO mark filing is defined exactly to the Moscow Exchange mark. Ms. Chollet, laws in Russia and the United States often describe principles relating to integrity and ethical conduct. Anyone who is regulated (anywhere in the world) is subject to fit and proper requirements that can be interpreted at will.
- Meta should understand that international peace and security is far more important than unnecessarily urging Meta's board of directors to do the right thing.
- Furthermore, xNY.io submits Citigroup's Metaverse and Money whitepaper on regulation profiling Mr. Zuckerburg's idea that, "There are different types of integrity questions." With additional comment from Nadine Dorries, Member of the United Kingdom Parliament and Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, who says "... Rebranding does not work. When harm is caused, we are coming after it."
- xNY.io has collated 33 highlights to Citigroup's Metaverse and Money whitepaper for Meta's board as general reference https://drive.google.com/file/d/1REoa87GCmt2uhDp7ZYswbTRw4ygQgjsL/view?usp=sharing
xNY.io asks not whether Meta's mark would damage the market for the Moscow Exchange (by, for example, devaluing it through parody or criticism), but whether it usurps the market by offering a competing substitute, potentially causing significant damage to digital asset purity and blockchain software technology innovation.
Sending you the very best regards.
Thank you,
Gunnar Larson
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 6:18 PM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:
Mr. Chollet:
It would appear today's correspondence confirms that Meta is seemingly aware of xNY.io's general concern.
- Meta has no real advantage questioning xNY.io's relationship with Moscow Exchange. Understand, xNY.io did not file USPTO application(s) seeking approval for a mark that is defined near exact to that of Moscow Exchange.
- Furthermore, on March 17, 2022 Sber announced digital asset issuance. This is one day before Meta's March 18, 2022 USPTO submission for mark approval relating to digital assets.
- Meta's board of directors may understand xNY.io's general concern of coordination and/or lack of coordination that could risk global digital asset marketplace purity.
- xNY.io asks not whether Meta's mark would damage the market for the Moscow Exchange (by, for example, devaluing it through parody or criticism), but whether it usurps the market by offering a competing substitute, potentially causing significant damage to digital asset purity and blockchain software technology innovation.
Mr. Chollet, the last point is key to resolving any question of xNY.io's relationship with Moscow Exchange. xNY.io's March 24, 2022 memo to Meta is clear and honest. We expect that Meta will not aim to muddy the waters on this important concern forward.
With all due respect, Meta’s board of directors may understand xNY.io cannot logically accept that the recent USPTO applications are not a marketplace manipulation exercise at xNY.io’s overall expense. Meta’s board of directors must ask itself, to the best of its knowledge, information, and belief, if further inquiry is reasonable under the circumstances?
Respectfully,
Gunnar Larson
On Fri, Apr 1, 2022 at 4:21 PM Chollet, Nicki <NChollet@kilpatricktownsend.com> wrote:
Dear Gunnar,
We write to confirm we represent Meta Platforms, Inc. in connection with this matter. Please direct all further correspondence on this matter to our attention.
We received your letter dated March 24, 2022 and your follow up from this morning. We reviewed your correspondence, however, we are unable to determine the merits of your claim. Specifically, your letter does not provide any information regarding a specific application or registration being asserted or any evidence of your relationship with any entity owning rights in the alleged Moscow Exchange mark. Before we can properly evaluate or respond to your claim, you will need to provide additional details regarding the basis for your claim and documentation of your relationship with Moscow Exchange or ownership in the Moscow Exchange mark.
Meta Platforms reserves all rights.
Sincerely,
Nichole Davis Chollet
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Suite 2800 | 1100 Peachtree Street NE | Atlanta, GA 30309-4528
office 404 815 6010 | cell 404 906 6948 | fax 404 541 3387
nchollet@kilpatricktownsend.com | My Profile | VCard
From: Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io>
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 7:23 AM
To: investor@fb.com
Cc: MetaProsecution <MetaProsecution@kilpatricktownsend.com>; cypherpunks <cypherpunks@lists.cpunks.org>
Subject: Re: Meta Platforms, Inc. Board of Directors - USPTO, Digital Assets and Moscow Exchange
Dear Meta Board of Directors:
It has been eight days since our original correspondence, seeking clarity between Meta's logo and the Moscow Exchange logo.
Offering Meta the benefit of the doubt, noting this could simply be some misunderstanding ... We seek Meta's clarification by 5:00pm today, Friday April 1, 2022.
Respectfully yours,
Gunnar Larson
On Thu, Mar 24, 2022 at 5:20 PM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:
Dear Meta Board of Directors:
Please find the attached memo addressed to your attention.
- Today’s correspondence is to kindly submit xNY.io’s overall concern of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Moscow Exchange mark similarities, specifically, both marks seemingly resemble a geometric design consisting of two loops and/orovals touching or intersecting.
xNY.io kindly asks Meta’s Board to respond by Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:00pm EST.
Respectfully yours,
Gunnar Larson
Confidentiality Notice:
This communication constitutes an electronic communication within the meaning of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Section 2510, and its disclosure is strictly limited to the recipient intended by the sender of this message. This transmission, and any attachments, may contain confidential attorney-client privileged information and attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Please contact us immediately by return e-mail or at 404 815 6500, and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
***DISCLAIMER*** Per Treasury Department Circular 230: Any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.