Calif. Justices Revive Bounty Hunter's Claims Against SF Atty <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/2315084?nl_pk=87c9365b-e736-431a-87d3-d121d8acafcf&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2025-03-26&read_main=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=8> By Emily Sawicki The California Supreme Court has ruled that a fugitive recovery agent's claims of malicious prosecution against an attorney who represented clients who sued the agent after their Oakland residence was searched via drug trafficking warrants were not untimely, finding that a one-year statute of limitations did not apply because the agent is not the attorney's client. Opinion attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/2315084?nl_pk=87c9365b-e736-431a-87d3-d121d8acafcf&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2025-03-26&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=8> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/legalethics/articles/2315084?nl_pk=87c9365b-e736-431a-87d3-d121d8acafcf&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=legalethics&utm_content=2025-03-26&read_later=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=8>