On July 16, 2015 11:49:47 AM grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Shelley <shelley@misanthropia.org> wrote:
On July 16, 2015 10:24:23 AM "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@lig.net> wrote:
On 7/16/15 7:51 AM, Georgi Guninski wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:02:31AM -0700, Stephen D. Williams wrote:
In a lot of ways, this is an elegant solution and could arguably be much more secure than desktop apps in Windows. Assuming your Lol, is this positive or negative argument?
it can hardly be less secure than windoze imho.
Cypherpunks + Windows, what do you think?
It's making me break out in hives, stop it! :p
*shudder*
The bazillion lines of effectively unaudited code in opensource kernels and software should have the same effect upon you.
It does; nothing is ever 100% safe, we must not become complacent. But FOSS : acne, Windoze (and Flash, Java, .js, etc) : ebola! -S