IA takes down specific items, not entire accounts, Feel free to file a complaint, but if you start gunning for my archives you'll be the one accused of having a vendetta not me. All I did was try to get the GCHQ slide up for discussion, JOHN inflated the issue by trolling me accusing me of faking the data. The leak never had to be disclosed if he had verified the redacted data and let me tell him what the problem was, but NO. JOHN couldn't let that happen. That wasn't me. 

But again, if you wanna talk about copyright violations, shall we turn our eye to Cryptome.org which is full of unlicensed reprints that DO NOT fall under fair use, since they don't have a disclaimer or copyright notice, nor did they seek permission to reprint it? AND they accept monetary donations for copies of the files? NO - because NONE OF THAT IS THE POINT. But like the trolls and disinfo artists you keep complaining about, you keep changing the subject from what matters - the GCHQ slide and whether or not it can be authenticated or discounted. 

On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Razer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:


On 10/12/2015 09:11 AM, Michael Best wrote:
You deliberately took that out of context and cut out relevant text. Troll. 

What I meant was not having to deal with the copyright complaints myself, and you OH SO CONVENIENTLY left out the very next sentence " If it turns out there's a violation I missed, the item gets taken down - not the entire site or all the uploads. " Which referred to Cryptome getting taken down over one document (which ultimately was allowed to stay up anyway)
DUDE READ THEIR TOS! On 10/11/2015 07:11 PM, Michael Best wrote:
> and not worry about copyright


It read about the same with the rest of the text, and since this whole thing is such an incredible waste of bandwidth, I cut to the chase. And no, if you infringe copyright IA takes your WHOLE THING DOWN because they don't want the have to go through it for more, and cancel your account. Ofc, you could start another...

IA is continually under a lot of pressure about copyright material appearing onsite, and I say you're a threat to a very valuable public resource. You should read my recent comment in one of the dozen or so threads you've generated, about being the bird dog in the snipe hunt and you never look to see who the 'hunters' are, and you're ARROGANT about it, and your whole discussion of JYA's logs is just one long look-at-what-I've-done-bc-xxx-did-this troll.

RR