On Sun, Jan 08, 2017 at 09:30:14PM -0300, Juan wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jan 2017 16:22:36 -0800 Razer <g2s@riseup.net> wrote:
On 01/08/2017 03:35 PM, juan wrote:
If some sort of magical mud magically liquified under a building, then the building would magically sink in a pool of mud. Especially when there are 'a couple' of videos showing a building that indeed seems to be 'sinking'.
Ok class. Here we have a tuning fork (A440) and a glass of water.
I know what resonance is, you motherfucking scumbag.
Now prove that
"the shock wave from the WTC tower hits liquefied the mud, and undermined the (shoddily constructed) building 7."
Since that is what 'really' happened, it must be documented everywhere. Even in places like wikimierda. So go ahead, post the link :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTC7_SUNK_IN_BROWN_SHIT_POOL_RAYZERZZ_SAYZ_ZO
Or are you claiming that you are a truther whose TRUE THEORY is BEING SUPPRESSED by a BURGEOIS CONSPIRACY?
Oh oh oh! I know, I know - pick me! Pick me! That razonance didn't liquify the mud, IT LIQUIFIED THE ROCK LAYER under the towers, which sunk through the rock and the rock de-liquified, leaving no trace (conspiracy theories and documentaries of 3 days of rapid cleanup of ground zero to the contrary) of the SUNK TOWERS! Here's the photographic proof of the post-liquified rock layers at ground zero: https://www.metabunk.org/claim-picture-shows-rock-formation-under-wtc-caused... (Come on! At least this variant of borderline-Razer-therapy includes photographic PROOF of the post-liquiefied rock layer...) Well color me pre-glacial sandstone.