Crime Of Inaction Leaves Justices Mulling Legal 'Absurdities' <https://www.law360.com/newyork/articles/2259587?nl_pk=ac5a3855-e47c-4403-bee6-ca14f9bcf831&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newyork&utm_content=2024-11-13&read_main=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=4> By Phillip Bantz The U.S. Supreme Court grappled Tuesday with whether an alleged mobster can be guilty of a murder-for-hire scheme if he did not physically participate in the botched hit job, with one justice remarking that both parties' interpretations of a "violent" crime of inaction could produce absurd results. 2 documents attached | Read full article » <https://www.law360.com/newyork/articles/2259587?nl_pk=ac5a3855-e47c-4403-bee6-ca14f9bcf831&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newyork&utm_content=2024-11-13&read_more=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=4> | Save to favorites » <https://www.law360.com/newyork/articles/2259587?nl_pk=ac5a3855-e47c-4403-bee6-ca14f9bcf831&utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=newyork&utm_content=2024-11-13&read_later=1&nlsidx=0&nlaidx=4>