1984 and Internet... never short of twisted things... Ever notice how whenever anyone popular with the people speaks out against the corruption, nonsense, hypocrisy, and evil operations of the Deep State and Globalist powers... Rumble is still standing for now, most other big commercial platforms have caved to demonetization, downranking, censorship, and outright deletion and permabans. Twitter X Tesla and Elon are under massive assult, SpaceX only survives because Govts depend on it to fuck each other and you over, but they're all being commanded now to perform illegal racist "migrant" hiring practices, prosecuted [forced] by US Democrats. Rumble, Bitchute, Odyssey, and a few other distributed and alt-platforms, those are the only survivors, for now. " What about Tara Reade whose alleged rape by Joe Biden was apparently not a rape because she'd once expressed some positive views about Putin? " " Funny how Russel has been in the spotlight his entire career, and only now gets allegations against him after he rants about political corruption and endless wars. Exposing the real enemy will result in demonizing. It's obvious. " " It seems to me the people are already doing something about it seeing as though the legacy media is dying off before our very eyes. The news was the establishment’s most powerful tool to program the masses and they are now rapidly losing that ability thanks to the internet. This is why wannabe fascists are so desperate to censor their political opponents’ online accounts no matter how shameless it makes them look. " " Op illustrates a good point. The gross inbalance in what is deemed a criminal act and what is not. Its the usual story of slight-of-hand and focusing on anything other than actually what is important. Yes, rape is important but I rather see an in depth breakdown of the events leading up to the invasion of Ukraine. I want to see the backhand business deals going on with Biden there in Ukraine, I want NATO to be held accountable for inciting Russia by fucking around on the expansion treaty. And I want all that on the news until we get to the truth. But that can all be fucked off with because the powers don't want us to know. Instead, we get fed dog shit and were meant to feel full. " " His ratio of volume vs quality of information is different than Assange, but it's just as harmful to the narrative. The average suburban housewife doesn't know wikileaks, but they're aware of Brand. The point of this post is what's not being covered. We've got the names of Brand's accusers; let's see the names in Maxwell's book. " " Hollywood and mainstream media loves you with you are a degenerate drug and sex addict. As soon as you get married, have children, get sober, find God, and start speaking truth, then they want to destroy you for having lived their value system and left it. " " This bullshit with Brand is such a clear smear campaign it makes me what to puke. I myself being a victime of unsolicitated sexual acts, i DID NOT wait fucking 20 years and oh, stay annonymous by that, to file a complaint.. i can understand fear and shit but Naw man.. this makes it even harder for people, Men and women, who have been SA victims to be taken seriously.. and what about INNOCENT TILL PROVEN GUILTY?!?!?! Youtube has put a demonitization on everything Russell will post now its clear they want him quiet and subdued because he speaks up against all their bullshit and now people are looking towards them. They dont like that! So they are doing everything to shut him up and shoot him down. I will keep supporting him and this will not stop their little disgusting actions to see the day, sooner rather then later. " " I'll start caring whether or not Russell Brand had some questionable sex a decade or 2 ago when the media starts caring what Bill Gates or Prince Andrew was doing on Epstein's island, or when it starts naming the customers Ghislaine Maxwell was convicted of supplying trafficked minors to. And I'll care about what one former US president is or isn't guilty of when the media starts caring what other former US presidents are or are not guilty of (or even what the current one's been up to lately). And I'll care about a more powerful country invading a less powerful country when the media reports the conflict and its context in exactly the same tone and with the same degree of neutrality versus moral outrage as it uses when the more powerful country in question is the USA (or any other NATO member). Until that day, the mainstream media and everyone who repeats its talking points on social media is nought but idle gossip and the sound of one hand clapping. Until that day I could not give less fucks about who the msm says any fucker fucked or didn't fuck, so fuck the msm. Let anyone it fucks with tell it to fuck the fuck off with its farcical fuckery. This is primarily, but not only, a British thing. It's British television and British media that are doing most of the smearing. Brand is British. He was employed at Channel 4 at the time Channel 4 now alleges he was committing the alleged sex offences. Channel 4 made accusations and insinuations in their program that are contradicted by their own more defensive statements when responding to enquiries by another British media outlet, - statements which claim that they, Channel 4, are not aware of any allegations or complaints having been made to them against Brand at the time in question. Brand also worked for the BBC at the time the alleged events took place. So neither organisation reported on Brand when he was working for them - even though that was when the alleged events took place - but now that he has a market share of audience for contemporary events and discussion which works against them - in the sense that they think by rights that should be their audience, tuning in to the messages that they choose to put out - now, they have something to report. I dare say if you're not from the UK, you don't have the full background of how all this has played out. Brand was a household name in the UK long before his streaming content regularly attracted audiences of several millions. The UK media establishments of which he was once a part are not taking kindly to their former employee striking out on his own and contradicting their oligarch-sponsored messaging, especially as his shows are popular with members of the British public who no longer trust the established UK media brands. In some ways the problem for those players is that Brand is now a rival brand. " " Maybe you are autistic or something but clearly his point is this media frenzy surrounding Russel Brand did not show the same moral outrage and narcissistic grandstanding when these things were coming out about Epstein island and Ghislaine Maxwell. Where the fuck are the two year media investigations into THESE FAR MORE IMPORTANT ISSUES? Instead people would rather gossip like pathetic worms about some celebrity former drug addict who is far less influential THAN BILLIONAIRE ELITES involved in blackmail intelligence operations to control politics. Imagine if these "journalists" spent the time pulling those threads instead of playing defense for the REAL ELITE BILLIONAIRES who pay their salaries. Pathetic that your average American is so dumbed down they cannot see the creeping fascism staring them in the face. Snitch culture is a product of Nazi Germany where they would find dirt on anyone criticizing their regime and then use the media which they owned to destroy that person. Do you not find it the least bit curious that these accusations are coming out now when this man has been the most vocal in his opposition to the current establishment? Do you not think intelligence agencies like the CIA keep a close watchful eye on influential people with large audiences and then undermine or sabotage people opposing their own attempts to socially engineer culture? Use your head. If this was anything but a coordinated attack, this would have all come out years ago WHEN HE WAS WORKING AT THOSE COMPANIES and WHEN HE WAS A BIGGER CELEBRITY THAN HE IS NOW. The only reason it is coming out now is because he ruffled some powerful feathers and they needed to destroy him because they are more afraid of people actually listening to what he is saying and awakening to the reality of what these elites are doing and have planned. " " They’re only going after Brand because he speaks the truth and it’s not in their favor. His following had gotten too big and he is against big Pharma (the vaccine). They have to shut him up. Danny Masters got railroaded on a 22 yr old accusation of nothing more than he said/she said. ZERO evidence whatsoever. If you haven’t learned by now that the left and the elite in power will destroy any obstacle in their way, by whatever means necessary. Create a virus and a pandemic, create a deadly vaccine, Epstein your ass, car accident, shot in the back, execute you in your home, accused rapist, and so on. Brand is their newest threat. " " So, Huw Edwards, famous BBC anchor, was outed less than three months ago for soliciting naked pictures from a 17 year old boy. And sending naked pictures to him. He's a married man with several kids. The media circled the wagons for him, didn't report it, and let him use "mental health" as an excuse when he freaked out after it was exposed. He was supposedly investigated and it was determined no laws were broken. So no one should pretend like there's equal justice, Hue Edwards is a pervert at best, and a likely pedophile. Compare and contrast to how much publicity Brand is getting. • In separate claims, the newspaper published messages the presenter allegedly sent to a 17-year-old after initiating a conversation on Instagram in October 2018. Latest figures released on Tuesday confirmed his six-figure salary as being between £435,000 and £439,999 a year, making him the highest-paid journalist at the corporation. Meanwhile, both the Metropolitan Police in London and South Wales Police have confirmed that, after looking into some of the allegations, detectives have found no evidence of a crime being committed and are not taking any further action. Edwards allegedly paid a teenager more than £35,000 for sexually explicit photos over a three-year period. Edwards allegedly sent threatening messages to a young person in their early 20s, who has no connection to the person at the centre of The Sun's story, the BBC previously reported. The star met the young person on a dating app before their conversations moved to other platforms, according to the corporation. He then revealed his identity and asked the young person not to tell anyone, BBC News said. The newspaper said it had seen messages suggesting the presenter visited the person's home, sent cash and asked for a picture - and was sent a semi-naked photo. https://news.sky.com/story/everything-we-know-about-huw-edwards-scandal-1291... " " Regardless of what Mr Brand is accused of none of the accusations compares to grooming a 14 year old boy waiting and eventually putting a human sausage up his bum when he was of legal age like Philip Schofield. That's like Woody Allen level of disgusting. There are real nonce's out there like those who you've mentioned and much worse living life on Easy St " " i will care when everything is equal and nothing is political and we work to root out all corruption. "