the tired out blowback of disregard i imagine this must have progressed significantly in the past decade, and i’m curious. a: “oh, they’re all disregardable-group, just ignore them until they die off” b: “oh, they’re all people-who-disregard-groups, just ignore them until they die off” split a: “oh, they’re all people-who-disregard-people-who-disregard-groups, maybe better fight them” b: “oh, they’re all people-who-fight-people-who-value-groups, maybe better fight them” thought a little of space before split seems likely is a general/normative situation that happens in a lot of systems, note for example personal obsessiveness when engaging a success, e.g. a job one is talented at. other things become more disregarded. but when we ignore things that are disregarded, they come back to bite us, and this is for example seen in the job example when the mind and body get older, more poor at learning new things, and lifelong investment was made in a single outmoded profession that is no longer useful. studies show the brain and body have responded by progressing ailments more quickly when we spent our lives doing one task. systems have complexity. each part of complexity that is left out seems to develop like a hernia or cancer, unless we really use our community skills. in the example system of disregard between a and b, it’s interesting in that there are two adjacent systems that are disregarding each other in some way …………. [daydream expansion inhibited due to the linearity of typing misrepresenting concepts that began].<- note, the inhibition reason also bears similarity to the concept under consideration. we need agilely and wisely reshape our influence paths to really engage a system in an honestly nourishing manner