https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1679598/allen-v-united-states/ I found this legal decision about 15 years ago. A Physics education disguised as a court case.
Your governments treat you as test fodder and slaves. So fuck them back... grow some balls, rise up together off your collective asses and sue all nuclear test govenments into bankruptcy for increase in global background radiation statistically provable increasing in everyone's cancers. Collect your damages against the "Government's" assets... they were paid for with money stolen from your family, so they're yours anyways. Want to make even more money... Government is not immune from all these crimes if you rise together and call their bluff there too... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tort https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbery https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extortion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Money_laundering https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Possession_of_stolen_goods and more... You don't even have to get physical like below, just crapflood the courts with cases for fun and profit. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rebellions_in_the_United_States https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_incidents_of_civil_unrest_in_the_Unite... XI. FINDINGS OF ULTIMATE FACT The court finds that defendant failed to adequately warn the plaintiffs or their predecessors of known or foreseeable long-range biological consequences to adults and to children from exposure to fallout radiation from open-air atomic testing and that such failure was negligent. The court finds that defendant failed to measure adequately and concurrently with open-air atomic testing the actual fallout in communities and population centers near the Nevada Test Site on a person-specific basis, or its equivalent, and that such failure was negligent. The court finds that contemporaneously with atmospheric atomic testing the defendant failed to adequately and continuously inform individuals and communities near the test site of well-known and inexpensive methods to prevent, minimize or mitigate the known or foreseeable long-range biological consequences of exposure to radioactive fallout, and that such failure was negligent. The court finds that as a direct and proximate result of such negligent failures, individually and in combination, defendant unreasonably placed plaintiffs or their predecessors at risk of injury and as a direct and proximate result of such failures that each prevailing plaintiff designated in Part X, beginning at page 446, suffered injury for which the sums set opposite their respective names should be paid. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW This opinion in its entirety shall constitute the Findings of Fact required by Rule 52 F.R.C.P. Based on the findings of specific and ultimate facts set forth above in this opinion and for the reasons set forth herein, the court concludes that each of the *448 designated prevailing plaintiffs (claimants) named in Part X beginning at page 446 above is entitled to judgment against the United States in the amount set forth in that section. As to the remaining plaintiffs of the bellwether group of 24, this court concludes as a matter of law that the evidence is insufficient in each instance to demonstrate with the requisite weight that the defendant's negligence proximately caused the condition of which each complains and further concludes that the United States is entitled to a Judgment of Dismissal as to each of them. Since the legal questions dealt with in the 24 bellwether cases have significance to those cases individually and to the remaining cases affecting more than 1,100 plaintiffs, the court will certify in the judgments to be entered that each judgment shall be entered as final pursuant to Rule 54(b), terminating this action as to each plaintiff, and that an appeal shall be immediately available as to each of the plaintiffs in the 24 cases, there being no just cause or reason for delay. In the event timely appeal is taken from such Judgment or Judgments, this court will stay consideration of the remaining issues in the pending cases while awaiting the outcome of the appeal. Attorneys for prevailing parties shall prepare and submit proposed judgments in accordance herewith and do so within twenty (20) days.