On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:14:24 -0700 Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
I'm mocking the idea that anarchy is workable for the existing population, generally.
so who the fuck you think are? =) Oh yes, you're an enlightened elitist who thinks he's way above the 'existing population', though not in moral terms of course, because he's an 'utilitarian'.
However, it's a hugely self-selected community, with an explicit social contract, and members who don't play well get shunned and booted. I really don't think that such a community would work for random sheeple.
So that's your argument against personal rights eh. Wait, your little community tale, whether real or imaginary, is not an argument. Then again, utilitarianism is even less of an argument.
So what's your path to anarchy? Love? Education? Kill the assholes?
That's not the subject at hand.
STILL, if people on this list were actually 'cypherpunks', instead of techno-fascist posers, then your comment would be as out of place as it should be.
There are no rules here, my friend :)
Of course there are rules. Basic logical rules. The pertinent rule in this case being : if you're not an anarchist, then you're not a cypherpunk, so what are you doing here? And just in case I need to spell out the painfully obvious. That's not a 'rule' to be 'enforced' by some 'owner' of some 'server'. So tell me, what do you think about the demographics of the flu farce in germany? What's your opinion as Englightened Science Worshipper? Do you want more thermal cameras like our Agent Jim Bell? Here, some basic arithmetic : https://lists.cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/2020-July/081633.html