You can find links to zipfiles from the laptop drives on the internet, the war room, gnews, hunter biden laptop archive, etc. Some hints from Nov 2020... https://mega.nz/file/bwgDlSDQ#QFR1-JR-cO3F7Jg_qPu0-nI96xO0tAQwfw6nUhYcwa4 https://ia801507.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/8/items/hb-docs/HB_DOCS.zip&file=Random%20Thoughts%20on%202018%20Business%20Plan.pdf https://ia801507.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/8/items/hb-docs/HB_DOCS.zip&file=NAMES%2FIncome.pdf https://ia601507.us.archive.org/view_archive.php?archive=/8/items/hb-docs/HB... https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/11/the_hunter_biden_emails_are_now... https://www.theepochtimes.com/t-hunter-biden-laptop Matt Gaetz Enters Hunter Biden Laptop Data Into Congressional Record https://www.theepochtimes.com/matt-gaetz-enters-hunter-biden-laptop-data-int... https://nypost.com/2022/03/29/gaetz-tries-to-get-hunter-biden-laptop-into-co... https://www.newsmax.com/politics/hunter-biden-matt-gaetz-jerry-nadler-laptop... https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-matt-gaetz-enters-hunter-bidens-lapto... https://grabien.com/story.php?id=372561 https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/07/cyberhacks_what_does_china_have... https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/10/why_is_joe_biden_buying_drones_... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_UnHvnuv14 Matt Gaetz Enters Hunter Biden Laptop Data Into Congressional Record Authored by Ken Silva via The Epoch Times (emphasis ours), “I seek unanimous consent to enter into the record on this committee the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which I am in possession of.” Hunter Biden walks to Marine One on the Ellipse outside the White House in Washington on May 22, 2021. (Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images) This request from Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) briefly brought the House Judiciary Committee to a standstill March 29, before chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) relented and allowed the laptop data to become congressional record—archiving the business deals, pornographic images, and illicit data said to be on the infamous hard drive. Gaetz’s surprise move followed a heated exchange with Bryan Vorndran, the assistant director of the FBI’s cyber division. The Florida representative asked numerous questions about the Hunter Biden laptop, only to have Vorndran profess ignorance to each one. “In December 2019, they turned over the laptop to the FBI. And now you’re telling me as FBI’s assistant director of cyber, you don’t know where this is after it was turned over to you three years ago?” Gaetz asked. “Yes sir, that’s an accurate statement,” Vorndran responded. Gaetz said he found Vorndran’s response shocking. The FBI official argued that investigations into the laptop are not his responsibility. Gaetz then asked whether anyone within the FBI’s cyber division has assessed whether Hunter Biden’s laptop has created a security vulnerability for the country. “We can do this back and forth for the next couple of minutes. I don’t have any information about the Hunter Biden laptop,” Vorndran said. Gaetz pressed further: “But should you? You’re the assistant director of the FBI’s cyber division,” Vorndran said that, according to FBI HR flowcharts, no he should not have any information. But he also declined to say who within the FBI would. Gaetz asked if the FBI would brief Congress on the laptop. Vorndran said he’d relay the request, but was non-committal as to whether a briefing will happen. “Is Congress worthy of such a briefing?” Gaetz asked, referring to Vorndran as the Chris Webber of the FBI—a reference to a basketball player who made a mistake that cost his team the NCAA championship. “So you don’t have it, you don’t know who has it, you don’t know where it is. Earlier this hearing, you were talking about whether you were the Grant Hill or Christian Laetner of the FBI,” Gaetz said. “It sounds like you’re the Chris Webber, trying to call time outs when you don’t have any.” Vorndran appeared to be short of temper by the end of the interchange. “I’m not going to answer that question!” the FBI official said in response to Gaetz’s repeated requests for a briefing. “The invitation says, ‘oversight of the FBI’s cyber division.’” Gaetz then silenced the chamber when he asked to enter the laptop’s contents into the congressional record. Only murmurs could be heard as chairman Nadler consulted with a staffer. “We will object, pending further investigation,” Nadler said. “What’s the basis for objection?” Gaetz asked. “It’s a unanimous consent request, and I object,” Nadler responded. “It may very well be entered into the record after we look into it further.” About 10 minutes later, after another representative questioned Vorndran, Gaetz again motioned to enter the laptop contents into the record. “After consultation with majority staff, I seek unanimous consent to enter into this committee content from, files from, and copies from Hunter Biden’s laptop,” he said. This time, no one objected. Gaetz was also allowed to enter the receipt Hunter Biden allegedly signed at the Mac store. https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/03/how_does_the_fbi_lose_a_laptop_... How does the FBI 'lose' a laptop like Hunter Biden's? By Monica Showalter Some things don't make sense. That brings us to some testimony from the FBI's assistant director for cyber-security, who told Congress's Rep. Matt Gaetz that he had no idea where Hunter Biden's laptop, entrusted to FBI custody, actually is. According to the Post Millennial: "Who has it?" Gaetz asked. "I don't know who has it," said [FBI Assistant Director for the Cyber Division Bryan] Vorndran. "What now you're telling me right here is that as the Assistant Director of FBI Cyber, you don't know where this is, after it was turned over to you three years ago?" Gaetz said. "Yes, sir. That's an accurate statement," Vorndran responded. "How are Americans supposed to trust that you can protect us from the next Colonial pipeline if it seems you can't locate a laptop that was given to you three years ago from the First Family, potentially creating vulnerabilities for our country?" Gaetz asked. "Sir, it's not in the purview of my investigative responsibilities," Vorndran said. "But that is shocking that you wouldn't, as the Assistant Director of Cyber, know whether or not there are international business deals, kickbacks, shakedowns, that are on this laptop that would make the First Family suspect to some sort of compromise," said Gaetz. Vorndran should be embarrassed. The whereabouts of this laptop are something he should know. Even if he doesn't have it, he should know who does have it because it's a computer matter that likely affects his job of protecting the country from cyber-attacks. The exchange continues: VORNDRAN: "Sir, as a representative of the FBI cyber program, it is not in the realm of my responsibilities to deal with the questions that you're asking me." GAETZ: "Has anyone at FBI cyber been asked to make assessments whether or not the laptop creates a point of vulnerability?" VORNDRAN: "Sir, we have multiple lines of investigative responsibility in the FBI. They're all available on public source." GAETZ: "I would think you'd know this one. I mean, I would think that if the President's son, who does international business deals, referencing the now-president with the Chinese, with Ukrainians, I mean, have you assessed whether or not the Hunter Biden laptop gives Russia the ability to harm our country?" Now, to try to understand how the Bureau man is arguing it, the guy seemed to be saying he is focused on cyber-attack activity from foreign countries, and the laptop is a domestic political matter. There is plenty going on on the foreign attacks front, and I hope he answered some important questions about Microsoft's charge that China did a major cyber-attack on its servers a year ago, as well as reports that Russia is suspected of cyber-attacks on the Colonial pipeline and America's meat industry. Russia got sanctioned big on the muddy information in that incident, which requires clarity about what the U.S. knows at this point, while China, which clearly was culpable, got no sanctions whatsoever. Does that sound funny? I wrote about that here. There's also the issue of Joe Biden buying China's spyware drones for U.S. national security purposes — which again raises more red flags. It would be nice to know what Assistant Director Vorndran has to say about that. All of these anomalies point to why the Hunter Biden laptop actually is important to U.S. cyber-security and does affect the job of protecting the U.S. from foreign cyber-attacks. Yet Vorndran is amazingly incurious. The Hunter Biden computer clearly shows the Biden family in sexually, legally, druggishly, and financially compromising positions, with significant potential for foreign blackmail. Given that Joe is prominently featured in that laptop as using his political influence as currency for the exchange of cash and political favors, it may well be that China evaded sanctions because of various financial matters cited in the contents of that computer. The same goes for which Russian oligarchs got sanctioned over Ukraine and which ones didn't. On the public credibility front, Vorndran does no better. He told Gaetz that the laptop was not in his investigative bailiwick, but a credible question could be raised as to why not. The influence-peddling cited in the laptop clearly affects his job, making it a lot harder to protect the country from cyber-attacks as certain cyber-attackers evade sanctions and others don't, certain drones get bought from China's spyware outfits and others don't. The fact that the computer, or enough of it, is out there in public and apparently not classified at all might be a factor for the apparent FBI indifference as to its contents — Intelligence Community characters like their information to be entirely secret, and this stuff isn't secret. But it doesn't explain Vorndran's ignorance of the computer's whereabouts. The FBI was entrusted to protect this device as part of its duty to protect evidence, and as evidence goes, this is a whopper. Where the Hunter Biden laptop is is something he should know. His claims that he doesn't know suggest sloppy stewardship or ignorance of Bureau procedures, if not outright lying, which is a distinct possibility, too. The fact that he doesn't "know" ultimately suggests that the Bureau remains a politicized agency, still at the exclusive beck and call of the Democrat party, as a sort of KGB for Democrats — and may well be why the U.S. is so ineffective at countering cyber-attacks, which at last reports are getting bigger and more dangerous than the Colonial pipeline attack, as AT contributor Julio Rivera wrote here. Was he singing for his supper to Joe Biden with this kind of remark? If so, that doesn't make the Bureau look good. Some twitterers have made important observations about this obvious appearance of politicization: Two years later and they don't know where the virus came from, or where Hunter's laptop is, or where all the billions in COVID stimulus went, or how many criminal illegal aliens have crossed into the country, but have no fear, they're going to get to the bottom of Trump's phone. — Rising serpent 🇺🇸 (@rising_serpent) March 29, 2022 Why does the FBI always “lose”, delete or ignore evidence of criminal activity committed by the Democrats [or UniParty], and then make up crimes when none exist to frame their enemies [ie. Russian Collusion Hoax, Gen Flynn, Kavanaugh, etc.]. Is that their true purpose? — Murray 🇺🇸 (@Rothbard1776) March 30, 2022 Hunter Biden’s laptop was probably PG compared to whatever was on Anthony Weiner’s hard drive. Let’s track that one down next. https://t.co/CJDFVwSLgS — Murray 🇺🇸 (@Rothbard1776) March 29, 2022 How anyone could argue with these observations is amazing. How indeed does the FBI lose track of something as pivotal as the Hunter Biden laptop? And why does it not seem to care? To Democrats, the press, and the politicized government agencies, it's all about ignoring the issue, and keeping corrupt old Joe Biden and his political influence-peddling machine happy. Why are they doing that?