Ms. Mazza:

The five day deadline has passed. 

This is very important particular to xNY.io - Bank.org's concern of a crypto RICO derrived out of the BitLicense. 

Ms. Mazza, when can xNY.io - Bank.org expect a response on the Robinhood records? NY-DFS' records response to Coinbase was extremely helpful. 

Have a great day.

Thank you,

Gunnar 

--

Gunnar Larson 

xNY.io | Bank.org

MSc - Digital Currency 

MBA - Entrepreneurship and Innovation (ip)

G@xNY.io

+1-917-580-8053 

New York, New York 10001 

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024, 2:21 PM Gunnar Larson <g@xny.io> wrote:

In accordance with Public Officers Law § 89(4), xNY.io - Bank.org elects to appeal this determination to withhold the Robinhood BitLicense Records.

Turn this matter as we will, any side whatsoever appears to require obstruction of justice. 

We further demand NY-DFS send xNY.io - Bank.org an update on the aforementioned appeal within five (5) business days. 

Reserving all rights, xNY.io - Bank.org is seeking relevant relief in California on Robinhood.

Warm regards,

Gunnar 

----

SENT VIA EMAIL

Email: G@xny.io

February 21, 2024

Mr. Gunnar Larson

xNY.io – Bank.org

406 West 25th Street

New York, NY 10001

Re: Freedom of Information Law (“FOIL”) Tracking No. 2023-095358

Dear Mr. Larson,

I write in response to the FOIL request that you submitted to the New York State Department of Financial Services 

(“Department”), which has been assigned the above-referenced tracking number and reads as follows: 

Dear Madam or Sir: On August 2, 2022 the Superintendent of Financial Services Adrienne A. Harris 

announced that Robinhood Crypto, LLC (“RHC”) would pay a $30 million penalty to New York State 

for significant failures in the areas of bank secrecy act/anti-money laundering (“BSA/AML”) 

obligations and cybersecurity that resulted in violations of the Department’s Virtual Currency 

Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 200), Money Transmitter Regulation (3 NYCRR Part 417), Transaction 

Monitoring Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 504), and Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). 

xNY.io - Bank.org would like to 

1. receive any and all records related to NY-DFS' investigation of Robinhood Crypto. Including (but 

not limited to) records concerning the bespoke Supervisory Agreement Robinhood Crypto has with 

the Department of Financial Services mentioned here: 

https://www.dfs.ny.gov/reports_and_publications/press_releases/pr202208021. 

2. In addition, xNY.io - Bank.org seeks any and all records concerning New York's approach to 

Robinhood Crypto and Goldman Sachs compliance programs mandated by the United States 

Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section and Money Laundering and Asset 

Recovery Section mentioned here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Yx88RMoeLyyfbNK0RtPl4r-

m8N21_1Sp/view?usp=drivesdk. 

3. Finally, xNY.io - Bank.org seeks records concerning New York's regulatory approval of 

Robinhood Crypto engaging a fine of $30M to implement heightened controls and additional

procedures and policies relating to electronic surveillance and investigation, due diligence on 

transactions or clients and the use of third-party intermediaries across business units; and enhancing 

anti-corruption training for all management and relevant employees.

To the extent the request is reasonably described, the Department construes the request as seeking the records,

correspondence, and work product exchanged between Robinhood and the Department in accordance with the Department’s 

August 1, 2022 Consent Order (“responsive records”).

The records that you seek relate to an ongoing Department investigation. Accordingly, your request is denied 

pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(i) (the “law enforcement exemption”), which excepts from disclosure records 

that are compiled for law enforcement purposes and that, if disclosed, would interfere with law enforcement investigations. 

The purpose behind the law enforcement exemption is to protect an agency’s investigative process from being compromised 

by revealing the scope and nature of an agency's investigation before an investigation is complete. See Matter of Pittari v. 

Pirro, 258 A.D.2d 202 (2d Dep’t 1999). It also bears noting that the law enforcement exemption applies to both civil and 

criminal investigatory files. See Madeiros v. Dep’t of Educ., 30 N.Y.3d 67 (2017). In this instance, releasing the requested 

records would interfere with the Department’s investigative process. Thus, the Department is not disclosing the records that 

you request pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(i). 

Moreover, in addition to withholding the responsive records pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87(2)(e)(i), the 

Department also is withholding the responsive records pursuant to Public Officers Law § 87(2)(a), which specifically 

exempts from disclosure records exempted by a state or federal statute. The applicable statutory provision is N.Y. Banking 

Law (“Banking Law”) § 36(10), which states, in pertinent part, that reports of examinations and investigations and 

correspondence and memoranda concerning or arising out of such examinations and investigations are confidential and shall 

not be made public. The statute fosters open communication between the Department and its regulated institutions, a 

necessity for effective regulation of financial institutions, by ensuring that records transmitted to the Department in 

connection with its supervision of a financial institution are protected from disclosure. 

The responsive records that were transmitted between Robinhood and the Department in connection with the 

Department’s supervision of Robinhood as a licensed money transmitter pursuant to New York Banking Law, constitute 

correspondence and reports concerning and arising out of an investigation and are, therefore, required to be kept confidential 

and exempt from disclosure under Banking Law § 36(10). The expectation that records transmitted to the Department will 

remain confidential is essential to encouraging candor and open communications between the Department, its regulated 

entities, and the entities undergoing regulatory review that submit such records. Release of such sensitive records, albeit 

responsive records, may have a chilling effect on the willingness of regulated entities to share information and cooperate 

with supervisors to resolve issues, and thus confidentiality is critical to the Department’s ability to perform its regulatory 

mandate and purpose. Accordingly, the exemption set forth in Public Officers Law § 87(2)(a) via Banking Law § 36(10) 

covers the responsive records.

In accordance with Public Officers Law § 89(4), you may appeal this determination to withhold the records within 

30 days by sending an email to FOIL.Appeals@dfs.ny.gov.

Very truly yours,

Stephanie Mazza

Associate Attorney

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <Stephanie.Mazza@dfs.ny.gov>
Date: Wed, Feb 21, 2024, 1:26 PM
Subject: Your Freedom of Information Law ("FOIL") Request FOIL-2023-095358-021587
To: <G@xny.io>

Dear Mr. Larson:

Attached please find the Department's determination regarding the aforementioned FOIL request. Because your request has been answered, your request is now closed.

Tracking Number:FOIL-2023-095358-021587