I'd say that this makes attempts to use Starlink anonymously rather ineffective, since Starlink, at least, knows your location.
All they would know is where, to within accuracy limits, the antenna was and is currently. They would not know who the paying subscriber[s] are, who the user[s] are behind it, nor to wherever else the subscriber[s] and user[s] further distributed that internet access out beyond the dish... such as feeding into local fiber copper, remote RF, back into anonymous overlay networks, resale, etc, or where the dish will be next. Knowing "where" an IP is, is not same as knowing "who" is behind it, user fuckups excepted. This was all discussed back in Media MAFIAA torrent days. And there were precedent setting court acknowledging the distinction, and in some cases affirming that the "who" was indeed not legally discoverable, or even legally pursuable if so, much to disappointment of MAFIAA. Consider also that subsidizing mentality of databasing "who", just weakens and victimizes everyone in the end, example massive censorship of free speech lately, tyrannical scoring systems in countries, etc. And filesharing, the free flow of information, now occurring over distributed anonymous overlay networks connected to tyrannical GovCorp ISP's, won a bit, such that now, even "where" is somewhat less knowable, at least for usage that would require disclosure of top-secret programs, for which torrenting pop stars does not qualify, yet, but will soon.
Starlink or anyone they choose to share their data with.
Starlink is part of the MilGov funded contractor SpaceX, it is highly possible that Starlink's real purpose is to give MilGov a distributed redundant global access to the net, plus whatever it can SpyVeillance with that many RF enabled birds eyes, plus the Room 641A and FISA 702 agreements of its network points, all under the plausible dual guise of providing civilian sales. And there is much historical exposed precedent for such models. Thus it is estimated that FOIA's for any MilGov relationship with Starlink, including that of obvious SpaceForce, NSA, NGA, etc will return a bunch of redacted pages and lots of Glomars.
they know where you are, even if your subscription isn't in your name.
Apologists making that argument, that therefore anonymity and privacy is invalid to seek, should be strongly refuted.
Hazarding a guess I would say Mollusk is set on Brinworld solutions
Well SpaceX is not yet offering the opensouce or cypherpunk communities free or at-cost[-plus] launches for their respective cubesats, so SpaceX cannot yet be considered free from some anti freedom biases, or even meeting some of their own grand rhetoric.
States like fascist Russia, China and Iran must regard the Mollusk as a Godsend.
No. News reports now clearly show that entire fascist G-20 govt's all love and clamor for all the digital tracking of cellphones, and now electric cars, they are even advertising remote GovCorp shutdown and 24x365 tracking permanent databases of all civilians cars, even putting micro cameras and microphones inside the cabin non-optional recording to user inaccessible flash. Truly disgusting 1984 level shit. Which is more embarassing mentality when considering little than 50 years ago most people in world were not yet under any silly "requirement" of "law" to have even driver "license" or "ID", and nothing was digital. Nothing changed with drivers, nothing really got better, only GovCorp got much worse.