I think the implication is that youre a JTRIG type

Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 9:18 PM
From: "Michael Best" <themikebest@gmail.com>
To: cryptome <cryptome@freelists.org>
Cc: cpunks <cypherpunks@cpunks.org>
Subject: Re: [cryptome] Re: Why cryptome sold web logs to their paying customers?

I'm not sure what the links are meant to imply. That the log leak was a disruption effort by the GCHQ that was planted when NetSol restored the site?

On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 5:03 PM, John Young <jya@pipeline.com> wrote:

https://cryptome.org/2012/07/gent-forum-spies.htm

25 February 2014. Related: GCHQ Full-Spectrum Cyber Effects:

http://cryptome.org/2014/02/gchq-cyber-effects.pdf

24 February 2014. Related: GCHQ Online Deception:

http://cryptome.org/2014/02/gchq-online-deception.pdf

GCHQ DISRUPTION Operational Playbook:

http://cryptome.org/2014/02/gchq-disruption.pdf

29 January 2014. Related: GCHQ Squeaky Dolphin Psychological Operations:

http://cryptome.org/2014/01/gchq-squeaky-dolphin.pdf (18MB)

4 March 2012. Precursor to this sabotage, OSS Sabotage of Organizations:

http://svn.cacert.org/CAcert/CAcert_Inc/Board/oss/oss_sabotage.html