On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 2:36 PM Punk-BatSoup-Stasi 2.0 <punks@tfwno.gf> wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2021 11:37:48 -0400
Karl <gmkarl@gmail.com> wrote:

> Is anyone aware of this being true?  Who is doing it?
>
> from
> https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333311442_We_Need_to_Talk_AI_-_A_Comic_Essay_on_Artificial_Intelligence
> pg39

Can anyone confirm that this professional work made by researchers is true, including current reconstruction of people's live behaviors in detail from a distance without video?

I am aware this is true but won't be able to come out of my reverie a little until somebody else can say they are.  I'm too scared to act on this deadly information.  Quite seriously.


>
> AI makes monitoring people much easier. 


        did you just figure that out? What you call 'ai' is just a more sophisticated search function for all the spying your govt does.

        there isn't any 'intelligence' in what you call AI. Please STOP using idiotic and misleading marketing jargon.

I was just copying the text from https://weneedtotalk.ai/

> It really comes close to magic.


        wow. STOP that garbage karl.

It looked like the author had seen the technology for monitoring people without a channel themselves and was impressed by it.

A lot of people are going to be mistaking machine learning for magic, going forward.

> [Some], for example, use AI bots, too, to spread hate and fake news in
> social media and, ultimately, mass media.
>
> Social media-users receive AI-personalized content of political
> organizations, based on users' personality profiles.


        again, there isn't any 'intelligence' in that kind of spam/propaganda.

"Military intelligence"

> Could we, in turn, use AI to enable better opinion-forming - and identify
> those who benefit from current AI tools?


        no. Only assholes use computers to manipulate people.

Dangerous for sure.  Turn your livefeed on before you do it.