On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 10:00:47 -0800 Rayzer <Rayzer@riseup.net> wrote:
The problem is when you ON YOUR BIKE, or someone in a car, decides to run into me.
Now it turns out that bicycles are a mortal threat too and bicycle users must be regulated by the 'collective', or for the time being, by the state? And why would I or anybody else decide to run into you? You are not talking about accidents anymore? The thing is, there are quite a few different means people could use if they consciously decided to harm you.
(Take my word for it, you're VERY vulnerable Juan. Ride carefully. Like your life depends on it.)
Thanks for your concern...Yes, anybody can slip in the bathroom and break his neck.
That's the hazard of a me-first society that's jettisoned proof-of-liability.
Are you willing to require 'proof of liability' for people engaging in any allegedly dangerous activity?
It becomes "my tire iron is bigger than your knife but his Glock trumps both" Libertardianist feudalism.
So you see nothing wrong with collectivism - the 'anarchist' authority of the 'herd' (in practice a de-facto state of course) over individuals and your analysis of the alternative system is just...a lame caricature of it?