The world is moving towards embracing the Swedish model for sexual-assault and rape and that is a good thing, though I personally prefer jury trials to the Inquisitorial model. GEOFFREY "sexual offence for a man to deliberately deceive a partner whose consent has been conditional upon his use of a condom" ROBERTSON The innocent man charged with rape doesn't act like Asshat did and jump-bail. The principled man charged with rape stands down from any responsible position while under that dark cloud - like Asshat didn't - despite advice from the better half of Wikileaks. Then - as I said - why not sue the CSM if you claim they're lying about your rape charge? And ASFAIK this statement still stands JULIAN " Being guilty of aggravated rape has nothing to do with our party" A. Broinowski. Wikileaks Party NSW candidate for au Senate. 2013. Then ' damage to the Au govt ' - give me a fuckin' break! "... Mr Assange agreed that some level of privacy was necessary for the successful operation of the military ..." http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/assange-i-can-rule-from-o... JULIAN " ‘[The military] protects the sovereignty of Australia. It protects the independence of Australia.' ASSANGE July, 2013 NONE of Asshats barmy-army has ever dealt with this extraordinary statement of guilt. He's excusing this appalling rape among others https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmudiyah_rape_and_killings Rapists - and rape apologists - like this one have all earned killing. Wikileaks apologists GO FUCK YOURSELF