Unfortunate that open public analysis of security models receives frowns from some business sectors that may have certain interests at odds. This has all been seen before... it's the age old 0day vs responsible disclosure debate... moved into covering the physical vs the digital realm. Get mad... don't... murder... Related... the fact that murder remains relatively both hard to defend against and easy to get away with... is one of the reasons that Assassination Politics... freaky crazy as it sounds to most, and if / when ever implemented... and though it might go further than aforenoted agnostic model analysis into perhaps 'price discovery' of the value to society of various specific change objectives listed... will never really result in actions of physical force, hardly beyond the underlying statistical norms of both chance and action... all but the most stubborn would change their ways beforehand... a change for the better via peaceful / logical reasoning. Is that not the point... to avoid murder. With CPU's and SW, when their source code is open, their manufacturing processes transparent, products inspectable, patches accepted, bugs squashed, producible by anyone, and are choosably force free among them... even to include none... as in beer, 0 days are said to be fewer and less frequently exploited, perhaps as fewer might see / have such need.