BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw (fwd)
---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 12:29:50 +0100 From: Rickard Berglind <Rickard.Berglind@EIKNES.SE> To: BUGTRAQ@SECURITYFOCUS.COM Subject: BugTraq: EFS Win 2000 flaw I have found a major problem with the encrypted filesystem ( EFS ) in Windows 2000 which shows that encrypted files are still very available for a thief or attacker. The problem comes from how EFS works when the encryption is done. When a user marks a file for encryption a backup-file, called efs0.tmp, will be created. When the copy is in place the orginal file will be deleted and then recreated, now encrypted, from the efs0.tmp- file. And finally, when the new encrypted file is succesfully created, the temporary-file ( which will never be shown in the user interface ) will be deleted as well. So far, so good. The only file remaining is the one which is encrypted. But the flaw is this: the temporary-file is deleted in the same way any other file is "deleted" - i.e. the entry in the $mft is marked as empty and the clusters where the file was stored will be marked in the $Bitmap as available, but the psysical file and the information it contains will NOT be deleted. The information in the file which the user have encrypted will be left in the backup file efs0.tmp in total plaintext on the surface of the disk. When new files are added to the partition will they gradually overwrite the secret information, but if the encrypted file was large - the information could be left for months. So how can this be exploited ? If someone steals a laptop or have psysical access to the disk it will be easy to use any low level disk editor to search for the information. For example, the Microsoft Support Tool "dskprobe.exe" works fine for locating old efs0.tmp-files and read information, in plain-text, that the user thought was safe. In my opinion there should be a function in the EFS which physically overwrites the efs0.tmp at least once to make it a lot harder for an attacker to gain control over secret information. Here is a description how to test this : Use any version of Windows 2000. Install the Support Tools from the Win2000 CD. For demonstrating purposes - create a new partition with the size of 7 MB. Choose to format with NTFS. Create a new small file ( easier to find ) with Notepad and put some text in it. Save this file in the root of the new partition. Do not encrypt it yet. Let us look at the file through DiskProbe before encryption- start Diskprobe from Support Tools on the Start Menu. A. Choose the "Drives"-menu and "Physical Drive" Double click on "physical drive 0" ( or other drive you are using ) Click "Set active" and then "OK" B. Choose "Drives" again and this time "Logical Volume" Double click the drive letter for your new partition and then "Set active" and "OK" C. Choose the "Sectors"-menu and "Read". For starting number type 80 and for the number - 35 perpaps. Maximize the window and click the arrow for "Next sector". At sector 86 you should see the name and contents of your file ( assuming you made a new partition ) The file is obiously in plain text and easy to read for anyone with physical access to this disk, regardless of permissions in the ACL, which is ignored when using this kind of utiliy. Better encrypt this file .. ! Now close the DiskProbe utility and open Explorer and locate your new file. Choose Properties - Advanced - Encrypted - OK. The file is now encrypted. Wait a few moments to be sure the new data has been written to the disk. Open Diskprobe again and repeat steps A, B and C. When reaching sector 86 you should be able to see the name of your file, but not be able to read the information - it is now encrypted. But.. continue to click the Next Sector-Arrow and look carefully at the information being displayed. A few sectors away from the orginal file there should be a file called efs0.tmp - which is the backup file EFS creats during encryption. You should ALSO be able to see the contents of this efs0.tmp file - which will be the data from the file you encrypted. The problem is just that the data is in clear and plain text. So again - anyone with physical access to this disk can read the data you thought was safe. / Rickard Berglind
participants (1)
-
J.A. Terranson