Re: Geopolitical Darwin Awards
At 11:42 AM 9/20/04 -0500, J.A. Terranson wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
(Remember the Hiroshima bomb was *not* tested, so sure were the scientists. Trinity
My understanding (and I am *positive* someone will correct me if I'm wrong) was that there was a shortage of both fissionable materials and appropriate [altimeter] fuse mechanisms, making testing a outside of enemy territory a losing proposition.
Fissiles were expensive, still are, but the design of U-gun is better (if you can afford the enrichment) because of U's lower spontaneous fission rate, ie fewer spare neutrons to spoil the fun. Even pure Pu-239, the result of short irradiation, has a problem with premature ejaculation.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:19:30PM -0700, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
fission rate, ie fewer spare neutrons to spoil the fun. Even pure Pu-239, the result of short irradiation, has a problem with premature ejaculation.
So use a tritium-boosted fission nuke. Not as hard to do a true fusion device. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
participants (2)
-
Eugen Leitl
-
Major Variola (ret)