F.B.I. Given Broad Authority to Monitor the Public
Get ready for the shit storm. I'm making a list, checking it twice, gonna found who's tree gets watered tonight...
F.B.I. Given Broad Authority to Monitor the Public By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Attorney General John Ashcroft on Thursday gave the FBI broad new authority to monitor Internet sites, libraries, churches and political organizations, calling restrictions on domestic spying ``a competitive advantage for terrorists.''
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-FBI-Reorganizing.html Hush provide the worlds most secure, easy to use online applications - which solution is right for you? HushMail Secure Email http://www.hushmail.com/ HushDrive Secure Online Storage http://www.hushmail.com/hushdrive/ Hush Business - security for your Business http://www.hush.com/ Hush Enterprise - Secure Solutions for your Enterprise http://www.hush.com/ Looking for a good deal on a domain name? http://www.hush.com/partners/offers.cgi?id=domainpeople
F.B.I. Given Broad Authority to Monitor the Public By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Attorney General John Ashcroft on Thursday gave the FBI broad new authority to monitor Internet sites, libraries, churches and political organizations, calling restrictions on domestic spying ``a competitive advantage for terrorists.''
Maybe I'm missing something fundamental here, but where does either Ashcroft or Bush have the ability to give the FBI any authority? The Constitution can give the executive branch authority for things, or Congress can legislate authority if it's Constitutional, or the courts can rule that existing statutory or Constitutional authority extends to some use the executive branch wants to make of it, or the Commander In Chief can tell the military to do military things authorized by Congress under declarations of war or other statutes, but that's not what the politicians and their pet press agencies are saying. If Ashcroft wants his underlings to monitor the internet, TCP/IP will let him do lots of things, and Bugs will let him do more, but if he needs cooperation from ISPs or other online service or content providers, his choices are either subpoenas or extortion. And if he wants them to investigate churches, I'd recommend that he first try being as fundamentalist about the Constitution as he is about his personal religious views, and see if that leaves him any room for bothering them.
http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-FBI-Reorganizing.html
Which AP was that again, and how long have they been online? :-)
participants (2)
-
Bill Stewart -
keyser-soze＠hushmail.com