-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- M. Stirner, <M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG>, writes:
Gee, am I amazed. An anonymous post claims to have been routed via SIXTEEN (presumably cypherpunks) remailers. Using the posted list of "active" cypherpunks remailers & the revised remailer manual, I have been unable to get simple
To: remailer@wherever.doodah.edu
:: Request-Remailing-To:
test messages to run through any but a couple (9, 10 & 12 I believe). I have _never_ been able to get any of the "insects @ Berkeley" remailers to go with the standard syntax...or otherwise.
The problem may be the Fidonet addressing. Many times I have tried to send mail to people with mailing addresses like M's, and not had the mail get through. I don't know what the rules are but perhaps some systems can get it and some can't. I'd suggest to M. that he take one of the systems that does respond to his remailing requests, and have that be the LAST one in a chain of two. So, he could send to, say, hh@cicada.berkeley.edu, and follow that with elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu. Perhaps this would get through: To: hh@cicada.berkeley.edu :: Request-Remailing-To: elee7h5@rosebud.ee.uh.edu :: Request-Remailing-To: M..Stirner@f28.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG Even if cicada can't mail to him, perhaps it can mail to rosebud which can then mail to Fido. Hal Finney hfinney@shell.portal.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQCVAgUBLCpauqgTA69YIUw3AQEoYwP/TUiqRu8OHgA61WM6HVtrZ/CE37hXjVY7 WM7sN+RkUlO+1QTeZKi2r0gEy/CGKnZiMTbEHYHcWK486tIbDZIDXqdRoZigEemH 5jwComG9Vv6wPMFyhcLQkejgSX7nN0UU4TGzdOOq2kRyiplTysLd+1pqPyUzpsbU qR9lO8ZjVPY= -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
participants (1)
-
nobody@shell.portal.com