Tim wrote: On Thursday, August 23, 2001, at 02:22 PM, "Faustine" wrote:

me. But if you're one of the anonymouses who won't sign your name to insults and baseless accusations? Well, I'd say you'd be better off the way you are. Just dont expect me to waste time reading it.

Ironically, this comes from one who uses an obvious (but unsigned!) nym. She/he/it/they criticizes others for "won't sign your name" posts, while we have no way of knowing who she/he/it/they is/are.

Check the headers, anything I say is accountable to "authenticated user a3495". At least this way, people I irritate have a pretty good idea who to bitch back at and where to hold a grudge. Obviously. And if you honestly believe I don't bring any value to the list, filter me.

This entity also claims the list is polluted with pseudonymous

No I didn't.

and anonymous posts. Ironically, I agree.

I think you mainly have your bloomers in a bunch because I told your anonymous ass-kiss toady to get a spine. Filter me. ~Faustine.