I feel like cross posting , making a connection between those two lists http://groups.google.com/group/global-survival http://groups.google.com/group/building-a-distributed-decentralized-internet sharing Poor Richard's post as context : https://groups.google.com/d/topic/building-a-distributed-decentralized-inter... including comments on https://www.facebook.com/groups/145538675490320/ and recent updates in relation to Netention prototypes : http://blog.automenta.com/2012/10/combining-netention-and-gss-into.html http://blog.automenta.com/2012/10/netention-semantic-editor-design-options.h... ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Dante-Gabryell Monson <dante.monson@gmail.com> Date: Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 11:44 AM Subject: Introducing Poor Richard to the list, and his vision for "distributed database using semantic linked-data structure" To: Poor Richard , global-survival@googlegroups.com Hi Poor Richard, I wish to introduce you to people on the global survival list , so that they can perhaps react and complete the approach currently taken. You can find more on http://automenta.com , including http://automenta.com/netention ( netention - did Seth coin it ? - stands for a combination of "Network" and "Attention" - code in development , released in a open / libre approach by Seth and other coders on this list , with some various Prototypes shared on http://blog.automenta.com/ ) And I wish to share with the list your following Facebook post and comments : * * *Poor Richard <https://www.facebook.com/po.richard>[image: posted to]P2P<https://www.facebook.com/groups/145538675490320/> * *I hope no one will mind if I indulge in a little visioneering here. I am imagining an information system of P2P practice and research. The P2P collaborative economy, free culture, and new commons movements are creating a lot of digital content. Most is in discursive and narrative form that is time consuming to read. Among this volume of content are case studies in a variety of formats (many very informal), business plans, proposals, and presumably many legal documents (charters, agreements, etc.). I am imagining a semantic ontology according to which the key ideas and data of this content could be parsed and tagged to form a distributed database using semantic linked-data structures. This would help transition the collective knowledge base of the research, activist, and social entrepreneurial communities into a machine-readable, semantically linked, searchable form. The P2P Foundation Wiki is an excellent searchable resource, and perhaps the semantic wiki extensions for the wiki engine could eventually be applied. "A semantic wiki is a wiki that has an underlying model of the knowledge described in its pages. Regular, or syntactic, wikis have structured text and untyped hyperlinks. Semantic wikis, on the other hand, provide the ability to capture or identify information about the data within pages, and the relationships between pages, in ways that can be queried or exported like a database."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Semantic_wiki<http://www.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FSemantic_wiki&h=jAQF0nKEbAQHQy7Ini6tbTKyUUQSzj5ViF1q4zsVBxLBuIQ&s=1> A fringe benefit of creating such data structures for existing content would be to provide common templates for future content creation and data collection.* *Semantic wiki - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia* en.wikipedia.org Asemantic wikiis awikithat has an underlyingmodel of the knowledgedescribed in its pages. Regular, or syntactic, wikis have structured text and untypedhyperlinks. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_wiki> "You should be able to easily select a view where all that information is included." "farther towards creating open linked-data structures" "I am focused on the ontology design first, but perhaps there are tools that cover both bases that I'm not aware of yet." "Poor Richard <https://www.facebook.com/po.richard> Another part of the "research information system" I am visioneering is pattern detection and recognition. An ontology gives us set of semantically charged patterns. Then what we need is a pattern language with which to parse existing content and match it with our ontology. I am thinking of something like the "regular expressions" used in the old unix text editors or in the Pearl and Awk programming languages I once used. http://encyclopedia.tfd.com/Regular+expressions " to which I replied : this is a vision we share. Programming work has been on its way. I invite you to have a look athttp://automenta.com/netention, and to join this list https://groups.google.com/group/global-survival I wish to share the following A phrase from Seth I wish to share in this context : *"I've explained to people that Netention is not just a product - but that it refers to the evolution of human language into new semantic and syntactical domains of higher expressiveness and effectiveness in programming reality itself, not just software. so anything that can help this goal ought to be part of the project, as long as it doesn't complexify it."* * * ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE