Fwd: [fc] list of papers accepted to FC'03
List of papers accepted to FC'03 --------------------------------
I see pretty much a standard list of crypto papers here, albeit crypto with a waving of finance salt. What ever happened to Financial Cryptography? The organisers did say they were going to look at wider accessibility for the coming year, but I see only these papers that are, from the titles at least, anything that speaks to non-cryptographers:
Fully Private Auctions in a Constant Number of Rounds Felix Brandt
Squealing Euros: Privacy Protection in RFID-Enabled Banknotes Ari Juels and Ravikanth Pappu
How Much Security is Enough to Stop a Thief? Stuart E. Schechter and Michael D. Smith
On the Economics of Anonymity Alessandro Acquisti and Roger Dingledine and Paul Syverson
Even they're a stretch. All are specialised, and none are of interest to the non-deep-techies. On a related front, how much interest is there in running EFCE this coming June? -- iang --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
-- On 15 Nov 2002 at 10:55, IanG wrote:
List of papers accepted to FC'03 --------------------------------
I see pretty much a standard list of crypto papers here, albeit crypto with a waving of finance salt.
Theory of what could be implemented has run well ahead of what has in fact been implemented. This has doubtless reduced enthusiasm for the theory. --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG XmqKAbnJ3zxWonUYjLQTEauIWVuczMy3fiZXjszK 4BOXbFJHRJ+piLFRffQdmB84zd8OiOgRKr7wytw+r --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
What ever happened to Financial Cryptography? The organisers did say they were going to look at wider accessibility for the coming year, but I see only these papers that are, from the titles at least, anything that speaks to non-cryptographers: ...
How Much Security is Enough to Stop a Thief? Stuart E. Schechter and Michael D. Smith ... Even they're a stretch. All are specialised, and none are of interest to the non-deep-techies.
I don't think you'll find our paper to be overly technical - at least not from a computer science or cryptographic perspective. We wrote this paper because we believe that determining the level of security necessary to deter an adversary is a problem of more general interest. Best regards Stuart Schechter
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 10:55:29 -0500 From: IanG <iang@systemics.com>
List of papers accepted to FC'03 --------------------------------
I see pretty much a standard list of crypto papers here, albeit crypto with a waving of finance salt.
What ever happened to Financial Cryptography? The organisers did say they were going to look at wider accessibility for the coming year, ...
That's the goal, but limitations are of course imposed by the submissions received. The Program Chairs intend to balance the program through their selection of invited speakers and panel discussions. Ray --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com
participants (5)
-
IanG
-
James A. Donald
-
R. A. Hettinga
-
R. Hirschfeld
-
Stuart Schechter