On Sat, 15 Sep 2001, Jim Choate wrote:

Yeah, you're fast running out of points that aren't dull.

Perhaps, but that's not my reason. I simply find you to be dull.

...

...

They people engaging in them certainly felt justified. Whether you agree or not is really a different question. It also demonstrates the relativity of 'good' and 'evil'.

Of course.

Then you admit the primary failure in your assertion.

What, exactly, do you think my assertion is?

Now you're changing the rules in the middle of the game.

Naughty on you...

I am? Please explain these rules to me, so that I may follow them.

The assertion was there are concepts of 'good'/'evil' which are accepted by ALL human societies.

"Are currently accepted" and "must always be inherently accepted" are two entirely different statements. I am claiming the former. This is not irreconcilable with your [rather obvious, and dull] points. -MW-