Re: Russian Programmer Not Eager to be Celebrity

On 13 Aug 2001, John R. Levine wrote:
I cannot express how fed up I am with this type of tunnel-vision HYPOCRISY. The same folks who are screaming that writing public crypto code must be covered by the 1st because "it is good" are screaming that Sklyarov is now "bad" because he writes spamware. One idiot went so far as to call for Sklyarov's *execution* because he may have written the program that was once used to send UCE/UBE to the miscreant whiner! The is same belligerently assinine argument that the anti-gunners use: a gun is designed to kill, so we must do away with the right to own them. Yes, I am aware that this politically incorrect (but logically accurate) statement is likely to get me flamed from here to hell and back (I can just see the "SPAM SUPPORTER!" pseudo-flames now...). -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin@mfn.org If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... --------------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 09:06:48PM -0500, measl@mfn.org wrote:
There are two obvious ways to defend Sklyarov: * This person is a great guy, wife, two kids, smart, grad student, academic, researcher, programmer, cryptologist, etc. He didn't do anything except piss off Adobe, and the DMCA is unconstitional anyway, so let him go free. * Okay, Sklyarov may be a spamware writer and we may worry about his poor sense of ethics and in fact he's not someone we'd want to spend any time with in person, but he should go free since the DMCA is unconstitutional and spamware, though we hate it, is 1A-protected. I think the antispammers are taking position #2. Nobody I have read says he should be locked up because of writing spamware. -Declan
participants (2)
-
Declan McCullagh
-
measl@mfn.org