http://roland.entierement.nu/blog/2012/03/01/looking-for-the-ultimate-distri... "Looking for the ultimate distributed filesystem, take 2" It ends with: """ In summary, I guess the replies I got didn't cause me to change my mind too much. Tahoe-LAFS still seems to be, if not the best solution, then at least the b least badb. Hopefully the drawbacks will be fixed soonish; the main sticking point (at least from my point of view) still seems to be the lack of focus on proper filesystem integration. I'll try setting it all up at some point; I may report further if I end up finding interesting things. """ I think I may have patronized the author, whose name I think is "Roland", in my email in reply to his previous post. I think I told him something to the effect that he probably wouldn't use "integration into his kernel as a filesystem" as much as he thought he would. I should probably work on a less patronizing way to argue about this stuff. Probably getting into more specific technical details and less general value statements is the way to do that. (I intend to reply to Greg Troxel's recent discussion of related topics on this list soonish...) Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-dev@tahoe-lafs.org https://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE