At 6:31 PM -0700 on 12/12/01, Anonymous wrote:

http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2/remailers/

... what that CNN article wanted to say.

One of the few articles on First Monday that doesn't make me bust out laughing. (The second one was by Tatsuo Tanaka about the macroeconomic effects of digital cash, however much I disagreed with his conclusions...) The fact that I edited both had *absolutely* nothing to do with that opinion of course. :-). Seriously, I didn't have any real idea how chains of remailers worked until I read Sameer's paper for publication, and, to this day, it is, by far, the clearest explanation of how they work that you can find anywhere. About a year later, I got roundly bitch-slapped on this list by Mr. May one afternoon about what a silly liberal-relativist academic navel-gazing exercise First Monday had become by that point, if it wasn't one from the outset, and, upon some reflection, I agreed, resigning my founding editorial board seat there sometime shortly thereafter. It was quite flattering to be put on the "masthead" of the first "peer-reviewed journal of the internet", or whatever. Looked nice on the resume, certainly. Not that anyone needs a resume, anymore, now that Google goes back to 1981... Cheers, RAH -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'