Neil Munro missed the basic trick that the Bush Administration has done here. Because of extensive previous abuse, Congress banned the NSA and CIA from spying on Americans - they're limited to spying on foreigners, while the FBI and other law enforcement agencies are the only ones who can normally spy on Americans and are subject to Constitutional requirements, like getting warrants for specific searches. The Patriot Act and CALEA let the FBI expand their powers significantly, with tools such as roving wiretaps, but there's still some semblance of court supervision. To accommodate problems like foreign spies talking to Americans, the FISA courts are a court system that operates in secrecy and can issue warrants based on classified information, which allow the intelligence agencies to do specific kinds of spying and wiretapping within the US. In theory, this provides some kind of independent Constitutional adult supervision; in practice it's a rubber stamp, and the only case in which they're publicly known to have refused a request was in the Wen Ho Lee witchhunt after it had become political. What the Bush Administration has changed is get its lawyers to say that the post-9/11 resolutions let them avoid even this level of supervision, letting the NSA wiretap inside the US without any warrants at all, and as far as I can tell from the NYT article, without notifying the FISA courts after they've started to keep records and possibly be ordered to turn the wiretap back off if the court disagreed with them. If this were simply a matter of speed, because half a day's delay in getting a warrant approved would interfere with their work, they could do that much - this is a major change in character. It's shameful that the New York Times sat on the story for a year - and if this were a legitimate activity, the Bush Administration wouldn't have pressured them into suppressing it that long. In separate news, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10454316/ , NBC reports that the Defense Department is back to spying on Americans, specifically anti-war groups and campaigns against military recruiting, especially suspicious groups associating with Quakers. They got busted for this back during the Vietnam war, and were supposed to have stopped, but they're doing it again in ways that appear to be violating the rules for data collection that were imposed on them and are clearly inappropriate in a free society. And the EU just voted to impose extensive data collection and retention requirements on ISPs and telcos, in ways that negate many previous European data privacy laws, as yet another reminder that when civil rights are protected by laws, that's only good until the laws are changed or the government starts disobeying them. It's time to get PGP working again (originally written for anti-nuclear groups who were being surveilled), give some more money to the EFF, get back to Quaker Meeting, and find ways to replace an Administration that thinks the Constitution is "just a goddamned piece of paper." Bill Stewart. ------------ From: "Munro, Neil" <NMunro@nationaljournal.com> Date: December 16, 2005 1:34:26 PM EST To: dave@farber.net Subject: RE: [IP] Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts >:o >:o Do please read the 42nd paragraph of the NYT story; ".....law enforcement and intelligence officials are still required to seek a F.I.S.A. warrant every time they want to eavesdrop within the United States. A recent agreement reached by Republican leaders and the Bush administration would modify the standard for F.B.I. wiretap warrants, requiring, for instance, a description of a specific target. Critics say the bar would remain too low to prevent abuses." So, as far as I can see, what's being targeted are international calls to or from known foreign terrorists (that are not yet covered by US civil rights laws) that mention, begin or end at U.S. persons. The CIA/FBI intelligence-take would drop if they had to get a judge's approval every time an AL-Q guy called up a new number for a brief phone call in the US. If this was the norm, then traditional eavesdropping on Atta would have been very unlikely, as he would have been able to use different street phones every time he called home. If voters want to accept that trade-off, Congress will give it to them. [....] ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as eugen@leitl.org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]