Shit I'm sorry, I left out the "irony smiley" again.

Citizen Q:

...

It's domestic terrorist extremist right wing supremecist group etc. who will be experience "fear and anger" over the new laws.

(Outraged Irony here)

...

Not "normal" people.

(Outraged Irony here)

...

Does this mean anyone fearing and angered by the proposed new laws will be a terrorist?

Auto - I hope you get a message back to your ranks that we're not going to stand for it and we're not all extremist right wing supremecist terrorists.

Aimee I would have suspected you of enough intelligence to catch the subtlety of intent by simple addition: Subject Line + followon = ironic disgust at the propagandistic spin caliming that only right wing supremacist terrorists are outraged angered, fearful. Get it? BTW, I can't really tell what the fuck you're saying either.

I most strongly disagree.

Solutions that provoke acts of domestic terrorism, rather than preventing them -- are not "solutions," no? While these groups may not hold legitimate opinions in the eyes of most Americans, they are legitimate threats. (I have used some responsive commentary in here to make this point elsewhere.)

In my opinion, some of these proposals not only "trade security for privacy," (their words) they are going to "trade privacy for terrorism." I think that's a bad deal for everybody.