possible solution to the anonymous harrassment problem
(I'm also marc@mit.edu. But composing over a 9600 baud line sucks :-) I just had an idea. Assume we have some sort of workable system for anonymous return addresses. What if every message were *required* to have one, and if the remailers verified their correctness (at least as far as we can, given the fakability of net mail)? Then, if someone received harassing email, she could ask the remailer maintainers to find the real name of the sender of a piece of mail. Assuming reasonable remailer maintainers (and we can use positive reputations to decide that), they'd be able to do this. The system has a built-in safety: All the remailer maintainers would have to agree that a message was indeed harassing to the recipient before they would use their private keys to follow the chain back. Unless all the maintainers agreed to trace the message, it would be impossible, and the sender's anonymity would be assured. I'm just trying to think of technical solutions to our societal woes, as hopeless as this may be. Remember, if people were honest, we wouldn't need encryption, either. Sigh. Marc
the remailer of my dreams would offer ironclad guarantees of anonymity. call me a cynic, but asking me to place my trust in the hands of ... well, just about anybody! leaves me cold. i recognize that social issues will surely arise, but society has managed to deal with anonymity in other contexts. for example, i can send postal mail with high confidence of anonymity, and can make anonymous phone calls (with care, e.g., by using phone booths and moving around). something tells me that the difference here is that we are getting remailer services for free. how's the cypherpunks bank coming along? i have an application in mind ... a final comment:
Remember, if people were honest, we wouldn't need encryption, either.
forgive me if i'm coming on too strong, but that is total bullshit. privacy and honesty are orthogonal. peter
participants (2)
-
Marc Horowitz
-
peter honeyman